DDTS vs. JULB
DDTS (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DDTS charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.
Performance
DDTS vs. JULB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDTS achieves a 5.10% return, which is significantly lower than JULB's 6.35% return.
DDTS
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 5.10%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULB
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 6.35%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDTS vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDTS Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF | 5.10% | 2.76% |
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 6.35% | 2.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDTS and JULB is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDTS vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF (DDTS) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDTS | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.92 | 2.17 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
DDTS vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDTS drawdown since its inception was -4.28%, smaller than the maximum JULB drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTS and JULB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDTS | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.28% | -5.24% | +0.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -0.07% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -0.87% | +0.35% |
Volatility
DDTS vs. JULB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDTS | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.72% | 6.81% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.72% | 6.81% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.72% | 6.81% | -0.09% |
DDTS vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDTS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDTS vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDTS nor JULB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, DDTS and JULB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTS.
DDTS and JULB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTS and 0.25% for JULB.
Find the right allocation for DDTS and JULB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer