PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDTS vs. BPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDTS vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF (DDTS) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDTS

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.66%
YTD
5.10%
6M
6.01%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BPH

1D
1.20%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTS vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDTS and BPH is -0.54, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026

-0.54

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDTS vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF (DDTS) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDTS vs. BPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDTSBPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.92

9.48

-7.55

Drawdowns

DDTS vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTS drawdown since its inception was -4.28%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTS and BPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDTSBPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.28%

-2.35%

-1.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

0.00%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.52%

-1.08%

+0.56%

Volatility

DDTS vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDTSBPHDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.72%

25.75%

-19.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.72%

25.75%

-19.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.72%

25.75%

-19.03%

DDTS vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDTS vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTS nor BPH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DDTS and BPH have a correlation of -0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTS.

DDTS and BPH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DDTS is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTS and 0.19% for BPH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDTS and BPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer