DDTS vs. BNO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

DDTS (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - DDTS is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. DDTS is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. DDTS charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BNO.

Performance

DDTS vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF (DDTS) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDTS achieves a 6.05% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 62.43% return.

DDTS

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 1.07%
• 6M: 5.16%
• YTD: 6.05%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: 9.13%
• 1M: -3.81%
• 6M: 54.67%
• YTD: 62.43%
• 1Y: 48.63%
• 3Y*: 19.45%
• 5Y*: 19.12%
• 10Y*: 12.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTS vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DDTS Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF	6.05%	4.57%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	62.43%	-6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between DDTS and BNO is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025	-0.26

Return for Risk

DDTS vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDTS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 39
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 42
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDTS vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF (DDTS) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DDTS	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.14	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.73	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.22	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.42	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.19	—

Drawdowns

DDTS vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTS drawdown since its inception was -4.28%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTS and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDTS	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.28%	-87.06%	+82.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.46%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.46%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-23.50%	+23.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.50%	-40.07%	+39.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	11.64%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDTS	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	16.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	39.09%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.46%	42.76%	-36.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.46%	36.11%	-29.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.46%	36.78%	-30.32%

DDTS vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

DDTS vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTS nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDTS and BNO in my portfolio?

DDTS and BNO have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DDTS or BNO?

On fees, DDTS is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDTS or BNO?

DDTS is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDTS or BNO?

DDTS and BNO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DDTS and BNO?

DDTS is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTS and 1.00% for BNO.