DDTN vs. BAPR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DDTN (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - November) and BAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. DDTN is actively managed, while BAPR is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

DDTN vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - November (DDTN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDTN achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly lower than BAPR's 10.04% return.

DDTN

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -0.03%
• YTD: 5.61%
• 6M: 5.17%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAPR

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 10.04%
• 6M: 10.03%
• 1Y: 18.64%
• 3Y*: 14.48%
• 5Y*: 10.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTN vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DDTN Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - November	5.61%	0.84%
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	10.04%	1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between DDTN and BAPR is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2025	0.92

DDTN vs. BAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DDTN	BAPR
Technology	38.4%	38.4%
Financial Services	11.0%	11.0%
Communication Services	10.8%	10.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	10.0%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	7.9%	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	4.6%
Energy	3.2%	3.2%
Utilities	2.1%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.8%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.7%

Return for Risk

DDTN vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDTN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BAPR

BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 96
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDTN vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - November (DDTN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DDTN	BAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.24	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	5.31	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.76	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	9.69	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	47.41	—

Drawdowns

DDTN vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTN drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTN and BAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDTN	BAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-23.91%	+18.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.01%	-0.93%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.81%	-2.58%	+1.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.39%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDTN	BAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.06%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.91%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.83%	5.79%	+2.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.83%	11.51%	-3.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.83%	13.09%	-5.26%

DDTN vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDTN and BAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

DDTN vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTN nor BAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDTN and BAPR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, DDTN and BAPR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, DDTN or BAPR?

Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDTN or BAPR?

DDTN and BAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDTN or BAPR?

DDTN and BAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.