PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDTN vs. JULB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDTN vs. JULB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - November (DDTN) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DDTN having a 6.37% return and JULB slightly higher at 6.52%.


DDTN

1D
0.04%
1M
2.05%
YTD
6.37%
6M
6.64%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JULB

1D
0.16%
1M
2.16%
YTD
6.52%
6M
7.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTN vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDTN and JULB is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDTN vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - November (DDTN) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDTN vs. JULB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDTNJULBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.71

2.21

-0.49

Drawdowns

DDTN vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTN drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, roughly equal to the maximum JULB drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTN and JULB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDTNJULBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-5.24%

-0.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

0.00%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.80%

-0.87%

+0.07%

Volatility

DDTN vs. JULB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDTNJULBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.71%

6.79%

+0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.71%

6.79%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.71%

6.79%

+0.92%

DDTN vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDTN vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTN nor JULB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, DDTN and JULB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTN.

DDTN and JULB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTN and 0.25% for JULB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDTN and JULB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer