DDTN vs. JULB
DDTN (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - November) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DDTN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.
Performance
DDTN vs. JULB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DDTN having a 6.37% return and JULB slightly higher at 6.52%.
DDTN
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 6.37%
- 6M
- 6.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULB
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 6.52%
- 6M
- 7.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDTN vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDTN Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - November | 6.37% | 0.99% |
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 6.52% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDTN and JULB is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDTN vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - November (DDTN) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDTN | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.71 | 2.21 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
DDTN vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDTN drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, roughly equal to the maximum JULB drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTN and JULB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDTN | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -5.24% | -0.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | 0.00% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -0.87% | +0.07% |
Volatility
DDTN vs. JULB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDTN | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.71% | 6.79% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.71% | 6.79% | +0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.71% | 6.79% | +0.92% |
DDTN vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDTN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDTN vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDTN nor JULB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, DDTN and JULB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTN.
DDTN and JULB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTN and 0.25% for JULB.
Find the right allocation for DDTN and JULB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer