DDTL vs. MOO
DDTL (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July) and MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDTL is a Defined Outcome fund managed by Innovator, while MOO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DDTL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MOO.
Performance
DDTL vs. MOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDTL achieves a 4.69% return, which is significantly lower than MOO's 5.15% return.
DDTL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 4.69%
- 6M
- 4.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MOO
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- 5.15%
- 6M
- 5.57%
- 1Y
- 6.63%
- 3Y*
- 1.24%
- 5Y*
- -1.12%
- 10Y*
- 7.00%
DDTL vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDTL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July | 4.69% | 4.70% |
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 5.15% | 1.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDTL and MOO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDTL vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank
DDTL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MOO
DDTL vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDTL | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.09 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.66 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDTL vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDTL drawdown since its inception was -3.78%, smaller than the maximum MOO drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTL and MOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDTL | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -69.53% | +65.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -21.21% | +21.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.45% | -16.97% | +16.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.01% | — |
Volatility
DDTL vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDTL | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.63% | 14.06% | -8.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.63% | 17.13% | -11.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.63% | 18.14% | -12.51% |
DDTL vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDTL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MOO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDTL vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison
DDTL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDTL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 2.35% | 2.47% | 3.41% | 2.93% | 2.15% | 1.17% | 1.10% | 1.26% | 1.69% | 1.44% | 2.14% | 2.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDTL and MOO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MOO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MOO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTL.
MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.00% for DDTL.
DDTL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while MOO is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTL and 0.55% for MOO.
Find the right allocation for DDTL and MOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer