PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDTL vs. MOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDTL vs. MOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDTL achieves a 4.57% return, which is significantly lower than MOO's 10.10% return.


DDTL

1D
0.02%
1M
1.32%
YTD
4.57%
6M
5.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MOO

1D
0.48%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
10.10%
6M
11.54%
1Y
13.06%
3Y*
3.07%
5Y*
-0.70%
10Y*
7.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTL vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDTL and MOO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDTL vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDTL

MOO
MOO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDTL vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDTL vs. MOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDTLMOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.27

0.22

+2.05

Drawdowns

DDTL vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTL drawdown since its inception was -3.78%, smaller than the maximum MOO drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTL and MOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDTLMOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-69.53%

+65.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-17.50%

+17.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-16.97%

+16.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

Volatility

DDTL vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDTLMOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.46%

13.88%

-8.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.46%

17.12%

-11.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.46%

18.19%

-12.73%

DDTL vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MOO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDTL vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison

DDTL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDTL
Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
2.24%2.47%3.41%2.93%2.15%1.17%1.10%1.26%1.69%1.44%2.14%2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDTL and MOO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MOO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MOO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTL.

MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.00% for DDTL.

DDTL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while MOO is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTL and 0.55% for MOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDTL and MOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer