PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDTL vs. DIVB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDTL vs. DIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDTL achieves a 4.64% return, which is significantly lower than DIVB's 20.66% return.


DDTL

1D
-0.45%
1M
0.09%
6M
4.64%
YTD
4.64%
1Y
11.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DIVB

1D
1.59%
1M
2.25%
6M
20.66%
YTD
20.66%
1Y
26.93%
3Y*
21.45%
5Y*
12.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTL vs. DIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDTL and DIVB is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDTL vs. DIVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDTL
DDTL Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DDTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDTL Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DDTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDTL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVB
DIVB Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DIVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVB Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVB Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDTL vs. DIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDTLDIVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.41

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

3.96

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.81

13.24

+2.58

DDTL vs. DIVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDTL Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the DIVB Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDTL and DIVB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDTL vs. DIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTL drawdown since its inception was -3.78%, smaller than the maximum DIVB drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTL and DIVB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDTLDIVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-36.93%

+33.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.78%

-6.82%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

0.00%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.44%

-4.96%

+4.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

2.04%

-1.32%

Volatility

DDTL vs. DIVB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL) is 0.90%, while iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) has a volatility of 4.46%. This indicates that DDTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDTLDIVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

4.46%

-3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.02%

9.12%

-5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.59%

11.79%

-6.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.59%

15.29%

-9.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.59%

18.35%

-12.76%

DDTL vs. DIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVB's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDTL vs. DIVB - Dividend Comparison

DDTL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDTL
Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DIVB
iShares Core Dividend ETF
2.20%2.50%2.61%3.18%2.02%1.63%2.08%2.07%2.52%0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDTL and DIVB have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVB has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to DDTL (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDTL dropped -3.78% vs DIVB's -36.93%.

On 1-year performance, DIVB leads with 26.93% vs 11.42% for DDTL. On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, DDTL has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DIVB has performed better with a 26.93% return vs 11.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTL.

DIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 0.00% for DDTL.

DDTL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DIVB is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTL and 0.05% for DIVB.

DIVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDTL and DIVB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer