PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDTJ vs. OCTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDTJ vs. OCTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January (DDTJ) and Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDTJ

1D
-0.97%
1M
0.50%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OCTB

1D
-0.93%
1M
0.66%
YTD
5.35%
6M
5.68%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTJ vs. OCTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDTJ and OCTB is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDTJ vs. OCTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January (DDTJ) and Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDTJ vs. OCTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDTJOCTBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

1.73

-0.30

Drawdowns

DDTJ vs. OCTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTJ drawdown since its inception was -5.15%, which is greater than OCTB's maximum drawdown of -4.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTJ and OCTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDTJOCTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-4.79%

-0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-0.95%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.83%

-0.70%

-0.13%

Volatility

DDTJ vs. OCTB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDTJOCTBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.99%

7.26%

+0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.99%

7.26%

+0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.99%

7.26%

+0.73%

DDTJ vs. OCTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTJ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDTJ vs. OCTB - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTJ nor OCTB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, DDTJ and OCTB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, OCTB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OCTB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTJ.

DDTJ and OCTB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTJ and 0.25% for OCTB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDTJ and OCTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer