DDTJ vs. APRB

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

DDTJ (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January) and APRB (Aptus April Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DDTJ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for APRB.

Performance

DDTJ vs. APRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January (DDTJ) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DDTJ

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRB

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 4.20%
• 6M: 4.58%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTJ vs. APRB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DDTJ Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January	4.65%
APRB Aptus April Buffer ETF	4.12%

Correlation

The correlation between DDTJ and APRB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026	0.91

Return for Risk

DDTJ vs. APRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January (DDTJ) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DDTJ	APRB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.44	1.81	-0.37

Drawdowns

DDTJ vs. APRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTJ drawdown since its inception was -5.15%, which is greater than APRB's maximum drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTJ and APRB.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDTJ	APRB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.15%	-4.59%	-0.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-0.71%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.83%	-0.74%	-0.09%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDTJ	APRB	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.99%	6.01%	+1.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.99%	6.01%	+1.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.99%	6.01%	+1.98%

DDTJ vs. APRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTJ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than APRB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

DDTJ vs. APRB - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTJ nor APRB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDTJ and APRB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, DDTJ and APRB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, DDTJ or APRB?

On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDTJ or APRB?

APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDTJ or APRB?

DDTJ and APRB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DDTJ and APRB?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTJ and 0.25% for APRB.