PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDTF vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDTF vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February (DDTF) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDTF

1D
-0.54%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USO

1D
-1.27%
1M
-21.05%
YTD
60.87%
6M
58.26%
1Y
45.61%
3Y*
21.25%
5Y*
17.42%
10Y*
2.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTF vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDTF and USO is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026

-0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDTF vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDTF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDTF vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February (DDTF) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDTFUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.57

DDTF vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDTF vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTF drawdown since its inception was -5.42%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTF and USO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDTFUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-98.19%

+92.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-88.16%

+87.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.99%

-75.31%

+74.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.02%

Volatility

DDTF vs. USO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDTFUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.80%

44.35%

-35.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.80%

36.32%

-27.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.80%

39.02%

-30.22%

DDTF vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDTF vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTF nor USO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DDTF and USO have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DDTF is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDTF is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.

DDTF and USO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DDTF is categorized as Defined Outcome, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTF and 0.86% for USO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDTF and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer