DDTF vs. USO
DDTF (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - DDTF is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. DDTF is actively managed, while USO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.56, they often move in opposite directions. DDTF charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
DDTF vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDTF
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USO
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- YTD
- 103.67%
- 6M
- 99.35%
- 1Y
- 101.55%
- 3Y*
- 29.98%
- 5Y*
- 24.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.07%
DDTF vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DDTF Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February | 4.45% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 86.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDTF and USO is -0.56, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | -0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDTF vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
DDTF
USO
DDTF vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February (DDTF) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDTF | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | -0.18 | +1.78 |
Drawdowns
DDTF vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDTF drawdown since its inception was -5.42%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTF and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDTF | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.42% | -98.19% | +92.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -85.01% | +84.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.04% | -75.30% | +74.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.82% | — |
Volatility
DDTF vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDTF | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 38.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.72% | 44.20% | -35.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.72% | 36.06% | -27.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.72% | 39.00% | -30.28% |
DDTF vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDTF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDTF vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDTF nor USO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DDTF and USO have a correlation of -0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDTF is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDTF is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.
DDTF and USO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DDTF is categorized as Defined Outcome, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTF and 0.86% for USO.
Find the right allocation for DDTF and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer