PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDTF vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDTF vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February (DDTF) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDTF

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.28%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USO

1D
2.62%
1M
-4.57%
YTD
103.67%
6M
99.35%
1Y
101.55%
3Y*
29.98%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
4.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTF vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDTF and USO is -0.56, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026

-0.56

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDTF vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDTF

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDTF vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February (DDTF) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDTF vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDTFUSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.61

-0.18

+1.78

Drawdowns

DDTF vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTF drawdown since its inception was -5.42%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTF and USO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDTFUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-98.19%

+92.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-85.01%

+84.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-75.30%

+74.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.82%

Volatility

DDTF vs. USO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDTFUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.72%

44.20%

-35.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.72%

36.06%

-27.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.72%

39.00%

-30.28%

DDTF vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDTF vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTF nor USO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DDTF and USO have a correlation of -0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DDTF is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDTF is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.

DDTF and USO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DDTF is categorized as Defined Outcome, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTF and 0.86% for USO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDTF and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer