DDTF vs. POCT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DDTF (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February) and POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. DDTF is actively managed, while POCT is passively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

DDTF vs. POCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February (DDTF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DDTF

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

POCT

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 4.83%
• 6M: 4.49%
• 1Y: 13.26%
• 3Y*: 11.57%
• 5Y*: 9.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTF vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DDTF Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February	4.31%
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October	4.13%

Correlation

The correlation between DDTF and POCT is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026	0.95

DDTF vs. POCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DDTF	POCT
Technology	38.4%	38.4%
Financial Services	11.0%	11.0%
Communication Services	10.8%	10.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	10.0%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	7.9%	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	4.6%
Energy	3.2%	3.2%
Utilities	2.1%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.8%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.7%

Return for Risk

DDTF vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDTF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

POCT

POCT Risk / Return Rank: 74
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDTF vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February (DDTF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DDTF	POCT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.16	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.08	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.43	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.03	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	15.34	—

Drawdowns

DDTF vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTF drawdown since its inception was -5.42%, smaller than the maximum POCT drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTF and POCT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDTF	POCT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.42%	-18.80%	+13.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.40%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.22%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.86%	-0.90%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.99%	-1.49%	+0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.87%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDTF	POCT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.80%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.96%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.80%	6.19%	+2.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.80%	7.97%	+0.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.80%	10.21%	-1.41%

DDTF vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDTF and POCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

DDTF vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTF nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DDTF Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDTF and POCT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, DDTF and POCT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, DDTF or POCT?

Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDTF or POCT?

DDTF and POCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDTF or POCT?

DDTF and POCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.