PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDSQ vs. PMMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDSQ vs. PMMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (DDSQ) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDSQ

1D
0.09%
1M
1.03%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PMMY

1D
0.06%
1M
0.70%
YTD
2.25%
6M
2.76%
1Y
6.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDSQ vs. PMMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDSQ and PMMY is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDSQ vs. PMMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDSQ

PMMY
PMMY Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PMMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PMMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDSQ vs. PMMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (DDSQ) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDSQ vs. PMMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDSQPMMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.12

4.59

-2.47

Drawdowns

DDSQ vs. PMMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDSQ drawdown since its inception was -3.69%, which is greater than PMMY's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDSQ and PMMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDSQPMMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-0.36%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

0.00%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-0.04%

-0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

Volatility

DDSQ vs. PMMY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDSQPMMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.71%

1.12%

+10.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.71%

1.39%

+10.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.71%

1.39%

+10.32%

DDSQ vs. PMMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDSQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PMMY's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDSQ vs. PMMY - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDSQ nor PMMY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DDSQ and PMMY have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PMMY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PMMY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDSQ.

DDSQ and PMMY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDSQ and 0.50% for PMMY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDSQ and PMMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer