DDSQ vs. KMAR

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

DDSQ (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) and KMAR (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. DDSQ is actively managed, while KMAR is passively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

DDSQ vs. KMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (DDSQ) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March (KMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DDSQ

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KMAR

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 2.03%
• YTD: 12.13%
• 6M: 11.71%
• 1Y: 23.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDSQ vs. KMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DDSQ Innovator Equity Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	9.91%
KMAR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March	12.13%

Correlation

The correlation between DDSQ and KMAR is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026	0.66

Return for Risk

DDSQ vs. KMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDSQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KMAR

KMAR Risk / Return Rank: 90
KMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
KMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
KMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 89
KMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
KMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDSQ vs. KMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (DDSQ) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March (KMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DDSQ	KMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.54	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.68	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.48	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.86	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	19.88	—

Drawdowns

DDSQ vs. KMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDSQ drawdown since its inception was -3.69%, smaller than the maximum KMAR drawdown of -11.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDSQ and KMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDSQ	KMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.69%	-11.32%	+7.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.05%	0.00%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.31%	-1.32%	+1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.19%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDSQ	KMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.87%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.71%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.85%	9.36%	+1.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.85%	12.08%	-1.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.85%	12.08%	-1.23%

DDSQ vs. KMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDSQ and KMAR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

DDSQ vs. KMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDSQ nor KMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDSQ and KMAR in my portfolio?

DDSQ and KMAR have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DDSQ or KMAR?

Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDSQ or KMAR?

DDSQ and KMAR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDSQ or KMAR?

DDSQ and KMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.