DDS vs. URA
DDS (Dillard's, Inc.) is a stock, while URA (Global X Uranium ETF) is Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Over the past 10 years, DDS returned 30.59%/yr vs 15.90%/yr for URA. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DDS vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDS achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 6.53% return. Over the past 10 years, DDS has outperformed URA with an annualized return of 30.59%, while URA has yielded a comparatively lower 15.90% annualized return.
DDS
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 14.47%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 6M
- -10.45%
- 1Y
- 58.44%
- 3Y*
- 27.17%
- 5Y*
- 35.97%
- 10Y*
- 30.59%
URA
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -14.61%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 32.44%
- 3Y*
- 32.17%
- 5Y*
- 18.77%
- 10Y*
- 15.90%
DDS vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDS Dillard's, Inc. | 0.66% | 46.81% | 13.47% | 32.05% | 38.66% | 306.41% | -12.71% | 22.76% | 0.97% | -3.63% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 6.53% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 46.25% | -11.32% | 57.57% | 41.33% | -3.54% | -22.11% | 19.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDS and URA is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2010 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDS vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
DDS
URA
DDS vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dillard's, Inc. (DDS) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDS | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.14 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 1.04 | +1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.60 | 2.30 | +3.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDS vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDS drawdown since its inception was -93.62%, roughly equal to the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDS and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDS | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.62% | -93.54% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.27% | -31.48% | +7.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.02% | -37.81% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.71% | -37.90% | -11.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.57% | -61.45% | -15.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.84% | -48.34% | +35.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.61% | -74.94% | +39.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.47% | 14.12% | -3.65% |
Volatility
DDS vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dillard's, Inc. (DDS) is 10.15%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 17.69%. This indicates that DDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDS | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.15% | 17.69% | -7.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.84% | 39.95% | -12.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.57% | 51.24% | -11.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.28% | 43.96% | +6.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.53% | 37.91% | +21.62% |
Dividends
DDS vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
DDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than URA's 4.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDS Dillard's, Inc. | 5.11% | 5.13% | 6.02% | 5.18% | 4.89% | 6.41% | 0.95% | 0.68% | 0.66% | 0.57% | 0.45% | 0.40% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.58% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDS and URA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URA has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to DDS (10.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDS dropped -93.62% vs URA's -93.54%.
DDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DDS and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer