DDOG vs. COST
DDOG (Datadog, Inc.) and COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) are both stocks. DDOG operates in Software - Application (Technology), while COST operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, DDOG returned 20.36%/yr vs 22.05%/yr for COST. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DDOG vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDOG achieves a 70.37% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 13.35% return.
DDOG
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 15.75%
- YTD
- 70.37%
- 6M
- 50.17%
- 1Y
- 89.65%
- 3Y*
- 34.31%
- 5Y*
- 20.36%
- 10Y*
- —
COST
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- -3.42%
- 3Y*
- 25.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.05%
- 10Y*
- 22.25%
DDOG vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 70.37% | -4.83% | 17.72% | 65.14% | -58.73% | 80.93% | 160.56% | 0.61% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 13.35% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 2.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDOG and COST is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2019 | 0.25 |
The correlation between DDOG and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DDOG:
$0.37
COST:
$26.51
DDOG:
620.53
COST:
36.77
DDOG:
5.56
COST:
2.88
DDOG:
22.93
COST:
1.11
DDOG:
$3.67B
COST:
$293.59B
DDOG:
$2.93B
COST:
$11.12B
DDOG:
$173.48M
COST:
$12.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDOG vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank
DDOG
COST
DDOG vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DDOG | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.98 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | -0.22 | +2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.63 | -0.51 | +4.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDOG | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | -0.18 | +1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.98 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.59 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
DDOG vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDOG drawdown since its inception was -68.11%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDOG and COST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDOG | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.11% | -53.39% | -14.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.62% | -15.38% | -33.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.62% | -20.74% | -27.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.11% | -31.40% | -36.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.51% | -10.93% | -5.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.87% | -13.36% | -17.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.77% | 7.15% | +17.62% |
Volatility
DDOG vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) has a higher volatility of 19.53% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 7.71%. This indicates that DDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDOG | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.53% | 7.71% | +11.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.44% | 14.53% | +35.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.67% | 18.79% | +46.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.25% | 22.71% | +35.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.06% | 21.95% | +38.11% |
Dividends
DDOG vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
DDOG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
DDOG vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Datadog, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DDOG vs. COST - Profitability Comparison
DDOG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Datadog, Inc. reported a gross profit of 797.20M and revenue of 1.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.2%.
COST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.
DDOG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Datadog, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.33M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.
COST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.
DDOG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Datadog, Inc. reported a net income of 52.57M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
COST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DDOG and COST have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DDOG has higher volatility (19.53%) compared to COST (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDOG dropped -68.11% vs COST's -53.39%.
DDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DDOG and COST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer