DDOG vs. CFLT
DDOG (Datadog, Inc.) and CFLT (Confluent, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — DDOG in Software - Application, CFLT in Software - Infrastructure. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
DDOG vs. CFLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDOG
- 1D
- -2.69%
- 1M
- 67.16%
- YTD
- 79.13%
- 6M
- 59.22%
- 1Y
- 103.51%
- 3Y*
- 34.40%
- 5Y*
- 22.46%
- 10Y*
- —
CFLT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDOG vs. CFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 79.13% | -4.83% | 17.72% | 65.14% | -58.73% | 67.33% |
CFLT Confluent, Inc. | 2.48% | 8.15% | 19.49% | 5.22% | -70.83% | 69.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDOG and CFLT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DDOG and CFLT has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
DDOG:
$88.85B
CFLT:
$10.90B
DDOG:
$0.37
CFLT:
-$0.85
DDOG:
24.11
CFLT:
9.20
DDOG:
22.28
CFLT:
9.33
DDOG:
$3.67B
CFLT:
$1.17B
DDOG:
$2.93B
CFLT:
$866.84M
DDOG:
$173.48M
CFLT:
-$339.97M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDOG vs. CFLT — Risk / Return Rank
DDOG
CFLT
DDOG vs. CFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) and Confluent, Inc. (CFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DDOG | CFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.20 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDOG | CFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | — | — |
Drawdowns
DDOG vs. CFLT - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDOG | CFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.21% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.89% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.73% | — | — |
Volatility
DDOG vs. CFLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDOG | CFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.40% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.23% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.07% | — | — |
Dividends
DDOG vs. CFLT - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDOG nor CFLT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
DDOG vs. CFLT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Datadog, Inc. and Confluent, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DDOG vs. CFLT - Profitability Comparison
DDOG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Datadog, Inc. reported a gross profit of 797.20M and revenue of 1.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.2%.
CFLT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Confluent, Inc. reported a gross profit of 235.16M and revenue of 314.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.7%.
DDOG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Datadog, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.33M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.
CFLT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Confluent, Inc. reported an operating income of -99.17M and revenue of 314.82M, resulting in an operating margin of -31.5%.
DDOG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Datadog, Inc. reported a net income of 52.57M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
CFLT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Confluent, Inc. reported a net income of -79.25M and revenue of 314.82M, resulting in a net margin of -25.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DDOG and CFLT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for DDOG and CFLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer