CFLT vs. IONQ

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CFLT having a -26.14% return and IONQ slightly higher at -25.14%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Confluent, Inc. (CFLT) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CFLT Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the IONQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFLT and IONQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither CFLT nor IONQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CFLT drawdown since its inception was -82.61%, smaller than the maximum IONQ drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFLT and IONQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Confluent, Inc. (CFLT) has a higher volatility of 24.98% compared to IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) at 21.28%. This indicates that CFLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IONQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Confluent, Inc. and IonQ, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.