DDNQ vs. UXJL
DDNQ (Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDNQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJL.
Performance
DDNQ vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDNQ
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDNQ vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DDNQ Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly | 4.44% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 10.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDNQ and UXJL is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDNQ vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (DDNQ) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDNQ vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDNQ drawdown since its inception was -5.65%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDNQ and UXJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDNQ | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -10.29% | +4.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -1.81% | +1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.65% | -1.62% | +0.97% |
Volatility
DDNQ vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDNQ | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.49% | 14.58% | -5.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.49% | 14.58% | -5.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.49% | 14.58% | -5.09% |
DDNQ vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDNQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDNQ vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDNQ nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DDNQ and UXJL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDNQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDNQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.
DDNQ and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDNQ and 0.85% for UXJL.
Find the right allocation for DDNQ and UXJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer