PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDM vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDM vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDM achieves a 24.32% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 38.71% return. Over the past 10 years, DDM has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 20.08%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 40.49% annualized return.


DDM

1D
0.86%
1M
4.37%
6M
17.92%
YTD
24.32%
1Y
45.60%
3Y*
27.53%
5Y*
14.31%
10Y*
20.08%
ALL TIME*
14.76%

TQQQ

1D
-2.65%
1M
-4.68%
6M
46.96%
YTD
38.71%
1Y
71.21%
3Y*
54.16%
5Y*
17.51%
10Y*
40.49%
ALL TIME*
43.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$16.79M$13.61M$11.73M
$5.00B$4.56B$5.34B

DDM vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDM
ProShares Ultra Dow30
24.32%20.59%21.60%24.34%-19.48%41.97%2.14%47.98%-13.46%59.56%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
38.71%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between DDM and TQQQ is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.75

The correlation between DDM and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DDM vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDM
TQQQ

Financial Services

27.0%
0.2%

Industrials

17.9%
2.8%

Technology

16.3%
53.8%

Healthcare

13.4%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
12.3%

Communication Services

5.2%
15.8%

Basic Materials

4.0%
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
7.7%

Energy

1.9%
0.6%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Financial Services

DDM
27.0%
TQQQ
0.2%

Industrials

DDM
17.9%
TQQQ
2.8%

Technology

DDM
16.3%
TQQQ
53.8%

Healthcare

DDM
13.4%
TQQQ
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DDM
10.4%
TQQQ
12.3%

Communication Services

DDM
5.2%
TQQQ
15.8%

Basic Materials

DDM
4.0%
TQQQ
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

DDM
3.9%
TQQQ
7.7%

Energy

DDM
1.9%
TQQQ
0.6%

Real Estate

DDM

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Utilities

DDM

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDM vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DDM
DDM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
DDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDM Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DDM vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDMTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.22

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

1.94

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.73

5.34

+3.39

DDM vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDM and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDM vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDM drawdown since its inception was -81.70%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDM and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDMTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.70%

-81.66%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.31%

-36.97%

+17.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.62%

-58.04%

+26.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.18%

-81.66%

+41.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.13%

-81.66%

+18.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-16.29%

+16.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.20%

-18.49%

+1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.24%

13.38%

-8.14%

Volatility

DDM vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) is 8.29%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 21.96%. This indicates that DDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDMTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.29%

21.96%

-13.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.01%

48.60%

-28.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.12%

58.14%

-33.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.67%

68.26%

-38.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.78%

66.67%

-31.89%

DDM vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDM and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

DDM vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

DDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than TQQQ's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDM
ProShares Ultra Dow30
0.87%0.94%1.00%0.27%0.83%0.18%0.31%0.62%0.89%0.68%1.08%1.23%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.52%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDM and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (21.96%) compared to DDM (8.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDM dropped -81.70% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 40.49% vs 20.08% for DDM. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, DDM has been the lower-risk option at 8.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 40.49% return vs 20.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DDM and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

DDM has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.52% for TQQQ.

DDM tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).

DDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDM and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer