PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDM vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDM vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDM achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return. Over the past 10 years, DDM has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 19.50%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.33% annualized return.


DDM

1D
-2.29%
1M
7.27%
YTD
9.35%
6M
9.82%
1Y
36.48%
3Y*
24.94%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
19.50%

TQQQ

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.35%
YTD
64.46%
6M
55.93%
1Y
137.89%
3Y*
69.49%
5Y*
28.37%
10Y*
45.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDM vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDM
ProShares Ultra Dow30
9.35%20.59%21.60%24.34%-19.48%41.97%2.14%47.98%-13.46%59.56%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
64.46%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between DDM and TQQQ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.75

The correlation between DDM and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DDM vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDM
TQQQ

Financial Services

27.2%
0.2%

Industrials

18.4%
2.8%

Technology

17.1%
53.8%

Healthcare

13.1%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
7.7%

Basic Materials

4.0%
1.1%

Energy

2.4%
0.6%

Communication Services

1.9%
15.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Financial Services

DDM
27.2%
TQQQ
0.2%

Industrials

DDM
18.4%
TQQQ
2.8%

Technology

DDM
17.1%
TQQQ
53.8%

Healthcare

DDM
13.1%
TQQQ
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DDM
11.6%
TQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

DDM
4.4%
TQQQ
7.7%

Basic Materials

DDM
4.0%
TQQQ
1.1%

Energy

DDM
2.4%
TQQQ
0.6%

Communication Services

DDM
1.9%
TQQQ
15.8%

Real Estate

DDM

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Utilities

DDM

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDM vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDM
DDM Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
DDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDM Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDM Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDM vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDMTQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

2.92

-1.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.17

3.09

-0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.40

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

3.75

-1.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.97

12.27

-5.30

DDM vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDM and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDMTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

2.92

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.43

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.69

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.74

-0.35

Drawdowns

DDM vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDM drawdown since its inception was -81.70%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDM and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDMTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.70%

-81.66%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.31%

-36.97%

+17.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.62%

-58.04%

+26.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.18%

-81.66%

+41.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.13%

-81.66%

+18.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-0.76%

-1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.33%

-18.52%

+1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.25%

11.28%

-6.03%

Volatility

DDM vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) is 5.95%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that DDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDMTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.95%

13.29%

-7.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.62%

36.04%

-17.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.25%

47.60%

-23.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.53%

66.53%

-37.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.76%

65.96%

-31.20%

DDM vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDM and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

DDM vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

DDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDM
ProShares Ultra Dow30
0.91%0.94%1.00%0.27%0.83%0.18%0.31%0.62%0.89%0.68%1.08%1.23%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDM and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to DDM (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDM dropped -81.70% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.33% vs 19.50% for DDM. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, DDM has been the lower-risk option at 5.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.33% return vs 19.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DDM and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

DDM has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

DDM tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDM and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer