DDM vs. SPYI

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

DDM (ProShares Ultra Dow30) and SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDM is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%), while SPYI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. DDM is passively managed, while SPYI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DDM returned 24.56%/yr vs 15.48%/yr for SPYI. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DDM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for SPYI.

Performance

DDM vs. SPYI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDM achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly higher than SPYI's 6.31% return.

DDM

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: 4.37%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 6M: 9.08%
• 1Y: 41.14%
• 3Y*: 24.56%
• 5Y*: 12.67%
• 10Y*: 19.87%

SPYI

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -0.52%
• YTD: 6.31%
• 6M: 6.98%
• 1Y: 20.84%
• 3Y*: 15.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDM vs. SPYI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30	11.15%	20.59%	21.60%	24.34%	4.75%
SPYI NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF	6.31%	16.67%	19.03%	18.09%	-3.96%

Correlation

The correlation between DDM and SPYI is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2022	0.82

The correlation between DDM and SPYI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDM vs. SPYI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DDM	SPYI
Financial Services	34.9%	11.1%
Technology	13.3%	39.1%
Industrials	13.0%	7.8%
Healthcare	9.6%	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	9.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	4.5%
Basic Materials	2.7%	1.7%
Energy	1.6%	3.1%
Communication Services	1.3%	10.7%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

DDM vs. SPYI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDM

DDM Risk / Return Rank: 46
DDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
DDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
DDM Omega Ratio Rank: 44
DDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
DDM Martin Ratio Rank: 47

SPYI

SPYI Risk / Return Rank: 71
SPYI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
SPYI Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SPYI Omega Ratio Rank: 76
SPYI Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SPYI Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDM vs. SPYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DDM	SPYI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.98	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	2.68	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.39	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	2.59	-0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.86	13.05	-6.19

DDM vs. SPYI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the SPYI Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDM and SPYI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DDM vs. SPYI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDM drawdown since its inception was -81.70%, which is greater than SPYI's maximum drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDM and SPYI.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDM	SPYI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.70%	-16.47%	-65.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.31%	-7.72%	-11.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.62%	-16.47%	-15.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.61%	-1.79%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.31%	-1.81%	-15.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.28%	1.53%	+3.75%

Volatility

DDM vs. SPYI - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) has a higher volatility of 8.72% compared to NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) at 3.62%. This indicates that DDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DDM	SPYI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.72%	3.62%	+5.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.64%	8.07%	+11.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.09%	10.10%	+14.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.67%	12.99%	+16.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.81%	12.99%	+21.82%

DDM vs. SPYI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

DDM vs. SPYI - Dividend Comparison

DDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than SPYI's 11.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30	0.90%	0.94%	1.00%	0.27%	0.83%	0.18%	0.31%	0.62%	0.89%	0.68%	1.08%	1.23%
SPYI NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF	11.80%	11.70%	12.04%	12.01%	4.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDM and SPYI in my portfolio?

DDM and SPYI have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DDM or SPYI?

DDM has higher volatility (8.72%) compared to SPYI (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDM dropped -81.70% vs SPYI's -16.47%.

Which ETF is better, DDM or SPYI?

On 3-year performance, DDM leads with 24.56% vs 15.48% for SPYI. On fees, SPYI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, SPYI has been the lower-risk option at 3.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DDM or SPYI?

Over the 3-year period, DDM has performed better with a 24.56% return vs 15.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDM or SPYI?

SPYI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DDM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDM or SPYI?

SPYI has the higher dividend yield at 11.80%, compared with 0.90% for DDM.

What is the main difference between DDM and SPYI?

DDM is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPYI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DDM and 0.68% for SPYI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPYI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.