PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDM vs. NRGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DDM vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DDM vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DDM
ProShares Ultra Dow30
-7.34%12.54%
NRGU
MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN
139.49%-33.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDM achieves a -7.34% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 139.49% return.


DDM

1D
0.92%
1M
-9.73%
YTD
-7.34%
6M
-1.68%
1Y
16.27%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
17.63%

NRGU

1D
-10.75%
1M
24.81%
YTD
139.49%
6M
107.68%
1Y
69.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DDM vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDM and NRGU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

DDM vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDM
DDM Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
DDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDM Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
DDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDM Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

NRGU
NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDM vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDMNRGUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.49

0.79

-0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.92

1.48

-0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.21

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

1.29

-0.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.63

2.64

-0.01

DDM vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDM Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDM and NRGU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDMNRGUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

0.79

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.61

-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between DDM and NRGU is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DDM vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

DDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDM
ProShares Ultra Dow30
1.08%0.94%1.00%0.27%0.83%0.18%0.31%0.62%0.89%0.68%1.08%1.23%
NRGU
MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DDM vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDM drawdown since its inception was -81.70%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDM and NRGU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DDMNRGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.70%

-57.50%

-24.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.92%

-55.24%

+34.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.36%

-17.40%

+3.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.44%

-25.38%

+7.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.12%

27.12%

-21.00%

Volatility

DDM vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) is 9.85%, while MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a volatility of 23.31%. This indicates that DDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DDMNRGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.85%

23.31%

-13.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.54%

50.27%

-31.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.55%

88.18%

-54.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.42%

87.12%

-57.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.69%

87.12%

-52.43%