PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDM vs. BITO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DDM vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DDM vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DDM
ProShares Ultra Dow30
-7.34%20.59%21.60%24.34%-19.48%5.23%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-22.79%-11.19%104.45%137.33%-63.91%-31.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDM achieves a -7.34% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -22.79% return.


DDM

1D
0.92%
1M
-9.73%
YTD
-7.34%
6M
-1.68%
1Y
16.27%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
17.63%

BITO

1D
0.60%
1M
-1.72%
YTD
-22.79%
6M
-43.10%
1Y
-23.27%
3Y*
24.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DDM vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDM and BITO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

DDM vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDM
DDM Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
DDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDM Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
DDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDM Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

BITO
BITO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDM vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDMBITODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.49

-0.52

+1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.92

-0.50

+1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.94

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

-0.42

+1.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.63

-0.89

+3.51

DDM vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDM Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is higher than the BITO Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDM and BITO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDMBITODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

-0.52

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

-0.08

+0.44

Correlation

The correlation between DDM and BITO is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DDM vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

DDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than BITO's 80.47% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDM
ProShares Ultra Dow30
1.08%0.94%1.00%0.27%0.83%0.18%0.31%0.62%0.89%0.68%1.08%1.23%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
80.47%78.29%61.59%15.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DDM vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDM drawdown since its inception was -81.70%, roughly equal to the maximum BITO drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDM and BITO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DDMBITODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.70%

-77.86%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.92%

-50.05%

+29.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.36%

-46.75%

+32.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.44%

-36.57%

+19.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.12%

23.73%

-17.61%

Volatility

DDM vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) is 9.85%, while ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) has a volatility of 12.84%. This indicates that DDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DDMBITODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.85%

12.84%

-2.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.54%

36.71%

-18.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.55%

45.32%

-11.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.42%

55.77%

-26.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.69%

55.77%

-21.08%