PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDLS vs. FDTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDLS vs. FDTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDLS achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly lower than FDTS's 17.99% return. Over the past 10 years, DDLS has underperformed FDTS with an annualized return of 9.83%, while FDTS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.63% annualized return.


DDLS

1D
0.37%
1M
2.07%
YTD
6.61%
6M
9.38%
1Y
21.82%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
9.97%
10Y*
9.83%

FDTS

1D
-0.69%
1M
-1.92%
YTD
17.99%
6M
21.67%
1Y
47.10%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
10.84%
10Y*
10.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDLS vs. FDTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
6.61%27.97%10.22%15.25%-10.13%17.75%-2.95%24.84%-16.92%26.91%
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
17.99%51.17%2.44%10.96%-15.34%11.79%12.90%18.71%-23.71%36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between DDLS and FDTS is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2016

0.56

Over the past year, DDLS and FDTS have become more correlated (0.79) than their long-term average of 0.56, meaning their price movements have been converging.

DDLS vs. FDTS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDLS
FDTS

Industrials

25.1%
23.0%

Financial Services

12.9%
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
18.4%

Basic Materials

8.0%
11.2%

Technology

7.8%
13.4%

Real Estate

6.3%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
5.0%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.0%

Energy

3.2%
4.3%

Healthcare

2.7%
3.0%

Utilities

2.0%
2.7%

Industrials

DDLS
25.1%
FDTS
23.0%

Financial Services

DDLS
12.9%
FDTS
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DDLS
11.2%
FDTS
18.4%

Basic Materials

DDLS
8.0%
FDTS
11.2%

Technology

DDLS
7.8%
FDTS
13.4%

Real Estate

DDLS
6.3%
FDTS
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

DDLS
5.9%
FDTS
5.0%

Communication Services

DDLS
3.7%
FDTS
3.0%

Energy

DDLS
3.2%
FDTS
4.3%

Healthcare

DDLS
2.7%
FDTS
3.0%

Utilities

DDLS
2.0%
FDTS
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDLS vs. FDTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDLS
DDLS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DDLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDLS Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DDLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FDTS
FDTS Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FDTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTS Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDLS vs. FDTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDLSFDTSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

2.78

-1.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.44

3.63

-1.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.48

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

3.96

-1.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.30

14.60

-6.30

DDLS vs. FDTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the FDTS Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDLS and FDTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDLSFDTSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.78

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.37

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.43

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.37

+0.27

Drawdowns

DDLS vs. FDTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDLS drawdown since its inception was -36.80%, smaller than the maximum FDTS drawdown of -51.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDLS and FDTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDLSFDTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.80%

-51.26%

+14.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.69%

-12.61%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

-13.19%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-33.11%

+13.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.80%

-51.26%

+14.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.38%

-5.41%

+3.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-10.66%

+4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

3.42%

-0.58%

Volatility

DDLS vs. FDTS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) is 3.97%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that DDLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDLSFDTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

6.47%

-2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

14.05%

-3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.96%

17.09%

-4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.75%

29.28%

-15.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.60%

24.85%

-9.25%

DDLS vs. FDTS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDLS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than FDTS's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDLS vs. FDTS - Dividend Comparison

DDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than FDTS's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
3.51%3.80%4.11%4.05%5.44%3.18%3.16%3.68%1.75%1.60%3.47%0.00%
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
2.55%2.94%3.94%2.90%3.71%3.01%2.02%2.30%1.96%2.08%1.78%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDLS and FDTS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDTS has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to DDLS (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDLS dropped -36.80% vs FDTS's -51.26%.

On 10-year performance, FDTS leads with 10.63% vs 9.83% for DDLS. On fees, DDLS is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, DDLS has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDTS has performed better with a 10.63% return vs 9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DDLS is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDTS.

DDLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 2.55% for FDTS.

DDLS tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Index, while FDTS tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DDLS and 0.80% for FDTS.

FDTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDLS and FDTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer