PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDLS vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDLS vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) and WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDLS achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 10.01% return. Over the past 10 years, DDLS has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 9.83%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 14.25% annualized return.


DDLS

1D
0.37%
1M
2.07%
YTD
6.61%
6M
9.38%
1Y
21.82%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
9.97%
10Y*
9.83%

DGRW

1D
0.27%
1M
4.42%
YTD
10.01%
6M
10.12%
1Y
22.57%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
14.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDLS vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
6.61%27.97%10.22%15.25%-10.13%17.75%-2.95%24.84%-16.92%26.91%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund
10.01%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DDLS and DGRW is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2016

0.65

The correlation between DDLS and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDLS vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDLS
DGRW

Industrials

25.1%
9.9%

Financial Services

12.9%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
7.1%

Basic Materials

8.0%
3.3%

Technology

7.8%
32.1%

Real Estate

6.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
6.7%

Communication Services

3.7%
10.1%

Energy

3.2%
5.0%

Healthcare

2.7%
12.8%

Utilities

2.0%
0.2%

Industrials

DDLS
25.1%
DGRW
9.9%

Financial Services

DDLS
12.9%
DGRW
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DDLS
11.2%
DGRW
7.1%

Basic Materials

DDLS
8.0%
DGRW
3.3%

Technology

DDLS
7.8%
DGRW
32.1%

Real Estate

DDLS
6.3%
DGRW

-

Consumer Defensive

DDLS
5.9%
DGRW
6.7%

Communication Services

DDLS
3.7%
DGRW
10.1%

Energy

DDLS
3.2%
DGRW
5.0%

Healthcare

DDLS
2.7%
DGRW
12.8%

Utilities

DDLS
2.0%
DGRW
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDLS vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDLS
DDLS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DDLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDLS Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DDLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDLS vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) and WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDLSDGRWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

2.30

-0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.44

3.35

-0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.43

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

2.76

-0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.30

12.13

-3.83

DDLS vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDLS and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDLSDGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.30

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.90

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.88

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.86

-0.21

Drawdowns

DDLS vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDLS drawdown since its inception was -36.80%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDLS and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDLSDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.80%

-32.04%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.69%

-8.30%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

-16.21%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-17.27%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.80%

-32.04%

-4.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.38%

0.00%

-2.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-3.01%

-2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

1.89%

+0.95%

Volatility

DDLS vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 2.34%. This indicates that DDLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDLSDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

2.34%

+1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

7.61%

+2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.96%

9.84%

+3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.75%

13.96%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.60%

16.21%

-0.61%

DDLS vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDLS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDLS vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

DDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than DGRW's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
3.51%3.80%4.11%4.05%5.44%3.18%3.16%3.68%1.75%1.60%3.47%0.00%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund
1.26%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDLS and DGRW have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DDLS has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to DGRW (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDLS dropped -36.80% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 14.25% vs 9.83% for DDLS. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 14.25% return vs 9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DDLS.

DDLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 1.26% for DGRW.

DDLS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while DGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. DDLS tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DDLS and 0.28% for DGRW.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDLS and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer