PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDLS vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDLS vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDLS achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 8.57% return. Over the past 10 years, DDLS has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 9.82%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 13.71% annualized return.


DDLS

1D
-0.54%
1M
0.38%
6M
2.11%
YTD
6.18%
1Y
15.89%
3Y*
16.34%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
9.82%
ALL TIME*
9.77%

DGRW

1D
0.49%
1M
0.69%
6M
6.01%
YTD
8.57%
1Y
16.02%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
11.41%
10Y*
13.71%
ALL TIME*
12.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$690.04K$775.99K$927.24K
$51.03M$48.50M$56.54M

DDLS vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
6.18%27.97%10.22%15.25%-10.13%17.75%-2.95%24.84%-16.92%26.91%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
8.57%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DDLS and DGRW is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2016

0.65

The correlation between DDLS and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDLS vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDLS
DGRW

Industrials

28.1%
11.8%

Financial Services

13.8%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
8.0%

Basic Materials

9.1%
2.8%

Technology

9.0%
33.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
6.7%

Real Estate

7.5%

-

Communication Services

4.1%
11.1%

Healthcare

3.6%
12.8%

Energy

2.4%
4.5%

Utilities

2.0%
0.2%

Industrials

DDLS
28.1%
DGRW
11.8%

Financial Services

DDLS
13.8%
DGRW
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DDLS
12.8%
DGRW
8.0%

Basic Materials

DDLS
9.1%
DGRW
2.8%

Technology

DDLS
9.0%
DGRW
33.8%

Consumer Defensive

DDLS
7.7%
DGRW
6.7%

Real Estate

DDLS
7.5%
DGRW

-

Communication Services

DDLS
4.1%
DGRW
11.1%

Healthcare

DDLS
3.6%
DGRW
12.8%

Energy

DDLS
2.4%
DGRW
4.5%

Utilities

DDLS
2.0%
DGRW
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDLS vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DDLS
DDLS Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
DDLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DDLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DDLS vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDLSDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

1.79

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.06

7.25

-2.19

DDLS vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDLS and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDLS vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDLS drawdown since its inception was -36.80%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDLS and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDLSDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.80%

-32.04%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.69%

-8.30%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

-16.21%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-17.27%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.80%

-32.04%

-4.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

-1.31%

-1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.67%

-3.00%

-2.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.05%

+1.08%

Volatility

DDLS vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 2.92%. This indicates that DDLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDLSDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

2.92%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.15%

8.33%

+2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.18%

10.44%

+2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.77%

14.01%

-0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.45%

16.18%

-0.73%

DDLS vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDLS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDLS vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

DDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than DGRW's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
3.64%3.80%4.11%4.05%5.44%3.18%3.16%3.68%1.75%1.60%3.47%0.00%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.28%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDLS and DGRW have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DDLS has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to DGRW (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDLS dropped -36.80% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 13.71% vs 9.82% for DDLS. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 13.71% return vs 9.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DDLS.

DDLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 1.28% for DGRW.

DDLS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while DGRW is Quality Factor. DDLS tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DDLS and 0.28% for DGRW.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDLS and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer