PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDIV vs. PRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDIV vs. PRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDIV achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly lower than PRN's 45.08% return. Over the past 10 years, DDIV has underperformed PRN with an annualized return of 10.13%, while PRN has yielded a comparatively higher 19.03% annualized return.


DDIV

1D
0.56%
1M
0.15%
YTD
9.05%
6M
7.35%
1Y
21.91%
3Y*
21.11%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*
10.13%

PRN

1D
-3.57%
1M
6.97%
YTD
45.08%
6M
39.29%
1Y
65.87%
3Y*
36.27%
5Y*
20.84%
10Y*
19.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDIV vs. PRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
9.05%12.23%27.18%9.95%-12.44%39.96%-3.59%32.40%-16.50%11.31%
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
45.08%13.74%30.35%37.96%-25.09%25.21%36.39%34.52%-16.19%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between DDIV and PRN is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2014

0.71

The correlation between DDIV and PRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DDIV vs. PRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDIV
PRN

Energy

27.0%
1.6%

Financial Services

22.2%
0.1%

Real Estate

15.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.6%

-

Industrials

6.4%
78.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
1.2%

Utilities

5.2%

-

Healthcare

4.0%

-

Basic Materials

3.0%
1.8%

Communication Services

2.8%

-

Technology

1.0%
20.4%

Energy

DDIV
27.0%
PRN
1.6%

Financial Services

DDIV
22.2%
PRN
0.1%

Real Estate

DDIV
15.4%
PRN

-

Consumer Defensive

DDIV
7.6%
PRN

-

Industrials

DDIV
6.4%
PRN
78.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DDIV
5.4%
PRN
1.2%

Utilities

DDIV
5.2%
PRN

-

Healthcare

DDIV
4.0%
PRN

-

Basic Materials

DDIV
3.0%
PRN
1.8%

Communication Services

DDIV
2.8%
PRN

-

Technology

DDIV
1.0%
PRN
20.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDIV vs. PRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDIV
DDIV Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
DDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
DDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

PRN
PRN Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDIV vs. PRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDIVPRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.35

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

4.68

-2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.14

15.34

-8.20

DDIV vs. PRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the PRN Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDIV and PRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDIV vs. PRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.56%, smaller than the maximum PRN drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDIV and PRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDIVPRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.56%

-59.88%

+12.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-14.15%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-30.78%

+11.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.10%

-34.84%

+13.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.56%

-36.27%

-11.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-3.57%

+3.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-10.82%

+4.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

4.31%

-1.24%

Volatility

DDIV vs. PRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) is 3.14%, while Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a volatility of 12.02%. This indicates that DDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDIVPRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

12.02%

-8.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.64%

24.35%

-12.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.36%

30.47%

-16.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.54%

25.41%

-6.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.90%

24.38%

-4.48%

DDIV vs. PRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDIV and PRN have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

DDIV vs. PRN - Dividend Comparison

DDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than PRN's 0.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
1.59%1.94%2.22%3.18%3.60%2.43%2.63%2.93%3.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
0.08%0.17%0.39%0.52%0.82%0.11%0.10%0.42%0.29%0.60%0.57%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDIV and PRN have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRN has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to DDIV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDIV dropped -47.56% vs PRN's -59.88%.

On 10-year performance, PRN leads with 19.03% vs 10.13% for DDIV. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, DDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PRN has performed better with a 19.03% return vs 10.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DDIV and PRN have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

DDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.08% for PRN.

DDIV tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Dividend Yield Index, while PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco.

PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDIV and PRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer