DDFN vs. FFTY
DDFN (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - November) and FFTY (Innovator IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDFN is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while FFTY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. DDFN is actively managed, while FFTY is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDFN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.
Performance
DDFN vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDFN achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly lower than FFTY's 20.11% return.
DDFN
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 4.46%
- 6M
- 5.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FFTY
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 7.67%
- YTD
- 20.11%
- 6M
- 21.02%
- 1Y
- 38.14%
- 3Y*
- 21.57%
- 5Y*
- -0.60%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
DDFN vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDFN Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - November | 4.46% | 0.64% |
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 20.11% | -12.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDFN and FFTY is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | 0.68 |
DDFN vs. FFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DDFN
FFTY
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
DDFN
FFTY
Financial Services
DDFN
FFTY
Communication Services
DDFN
FFTY
Consumer Cyclical
DDFN
FFTY
Healthcare
DDFN
FFTY
Industrials
DDFN
FFTY
Consumer Defensive
DDFN
FFTY
-
Energy
DDFN
FFTY
Utilities
DDFN
FFTY
Real Estate
DDFN
FFTY
-
Basic Materials
DDFN
FFTY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDFN vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank
DDFN
FFTY
DDFN vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - November (DDFN) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDFN | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.73 | 0.20 | +1.54 |
Drawdowns
DDFN vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDFN drawdown since its inception was -3.40%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFN and FFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDFN | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.40% | -59.46% | +56.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -15.34% | +15.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.47% | -22.38% | +21.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.77% | — |
Volatility
DDFN vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDFN | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 26.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.26% | 34.09% | -28.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.26% | 29.14% | -23.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.26% | 27.41% | -22.15% |
DDFN vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDFN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDFN vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison
DDFN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDFN Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - November | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 1.12% | 1.35% | 0.91% | 0.65% | 2.75% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDFN and FFTY have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDFN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDFN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.
FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for DDFN.
DDFN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FFTY is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFN and 0.80% for FFTY.
Find the right allocation for DDFN and FFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer