PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDFM vs. UXJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDFM vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - March (DDFM) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDFM

1D
0.10%
1M
1.05%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UXJL

1D
0.46%
1M
5.57%
YTD
12.29%
6M
12.01%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDFM vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDFM and UXJL is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2026

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDFM vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - March (DDFM) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDFM vs. UXJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDFMUXJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.24

1.91

+0.33

Drawdowns

DDFM vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDFM drawdown since its inception was -3.09%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFM and UXJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDFMUXJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.09%

-10.29%

+7.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.31%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.52%

-1.51%

+0.99%

Volatility

DDFM vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDFMUXJLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.89%

13.88%

-7.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.89%

13.88%

-7.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.89%

13.88%

-7.99%

DDFM vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDFM has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDFM vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDFM nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DDFM and UXJL have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DDFM is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDFM is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.

DDFM and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFM and 0.85% for UXJL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDFM and UXJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer