PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDFLX vs. IBNAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDFLX vs. IBNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Floating Rate Fund (DDFLX) and Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund (IBNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDFLX achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly lower than IBNAX's 6.51% return. Over the past 10 years, DDFLX has underperformed IBNAX with an annualized return of 5.41%, while IBNAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.17% annualized return.


DDFLX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.67%
YTD
1.89%
6M
2.59%
1Y
6.20%
3Y*
8.22%
5Y*
5.79%
10Y*
5.41%

IBNAX

1D
0.07%
1M
2.22%
YTD
6.51%
6M
6.20%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
9.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDFLX vs. IBNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDFLX
Delaware Floating Rate Fund
1.89%6.01%8.92%10.75%-0.62%5.46%3.17%10.69%1.26%4.55%
IBNAX
Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund
6.51%12.17%15.68%16.19%-16.41%16.22%14.34%22.13%-3.32%11.37%

Correlation

The correlation between DDFLX and IBNAX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2010

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDFLX vs. IBNAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDFLX
DDFLX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DDFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DDFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

IBNAX
IBNAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IBNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IBNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDFLX vs. IBNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Floating Rate Fund (DDFLX) and Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund (IBNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDFLXIBNAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.77

1.85

+0.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.81

2.67

+4.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.22

1.34

+0.88

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.63

2.28

+3.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.66

9.80

+10.86

DDFLX vs. IBNAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDFLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the IBNAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDFLX and IBNAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDFLXIBNAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

1.85

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.16

0.37

+1.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.55

0.55

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

0.36

+1.00

Drawdowns

DDFLX vs. IBNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDFLX drawdown since its inception was -18.09%, smaller than the maximum IBNAX drawdown of -52.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFLX and IBNAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDFLXIBNAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.09%

-52.04%

+33.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.11%

-7.42%

+6.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.05%

-10.91%

+8.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.18%

-28.04%

+22.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.09%

-28.04%

+9.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.37%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.67%

-10.48%

+9.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

1.72%

-1.42%

Volatility

DDFLX vs. IBNAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Delaware Floating Rate Fund (DDFLX) is 0.61%, while Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund (IBNAX) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that DDFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBNAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDFLXIBNAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

3.04%

-2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.69%

7.46%

-5.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26%

9.11%

-6.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.70%

20.09%

-17.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.50%

16.66%

-13.16%

DDFLX vs. IBNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDFLX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than IBNAX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDFLX vs. IBNAX - Dividend Comparison

DDFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, more than IBNAX's 2.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDFLX
Delaware Floating Rate Fund
6.79%7.21%8.62%7.17%5.04%3.96%4.89%6.54%5.73%4.33%2.09%2.34%
IBNAX
Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund
2.91%3.10%1.86%1.11%26.49%11.58%6.76%7.70%11.85%4.62%2.31%6.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDFLX and IBNAX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBNAX has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to DDFLX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDFLX dropped -18.09% vs IBNAX's -52.04%.

DDFLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDFLX and IBNAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer