DDFL vs. NFXS
DDFL (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July) and NFXS (Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - DDFL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while NFXS is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. DDFL charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for NFXS.
Performance
DDFL vs. NFXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDFL achieves a 2.93% return, which is significantly lower than NFXS's 24.21% return.
DDFL
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 2.93%
- 6M
- 3.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFXS
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 21.28%
- YTD
- 24.21%
- 6M
- 24.00%
- 1Y
- 64.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDFL vs. NFXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDFL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July | 2.93% | 2.85% |
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares | 24.21% | 41.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDFL and NFXS is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDFL vs. NFXS — Risk / Return Rank
DDFL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NFXS
DDFL vs. NFXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July (DDFL) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDFL | NFXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.06 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.64 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDFL vs. NFXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDFL drawdown since its inception was -1.83%, smaller than the maximum NFXS drawdown of -50.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFL and NFXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDFL | NFXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -50.37% | +48.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -31.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -12.88% | +12.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -31.93% | +31.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.45% | — |
Volatility
DDFL vs. NFXS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDFL | NFXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 26.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 33.81% | -30.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 34.65% | -30.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 34.65% | -30.95% |
DDFL vs. NFXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDFL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than NFXS's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDFL vs. NFXS - Dividend Comparison
DDFL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NFXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DDFL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares | 3.23% | 3.53% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDFL and NFXS have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDFL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDFL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for NFXS.
NFXS has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 0.00% for DDFL.
DDFL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while NFXS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFL and 1.03% for NFXS.
Find the right allocation for DDFL and NFXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer