PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDFL vs. BOUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDFL vs. BOUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July (DDFL) and Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDFL achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly lower than BOUT's 28.54% return.


DDFL

1D
0.14%
1M
0.85%
6M
3.50%
YTD
3.71%
1Y
8.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BOUT

1D
-0.74%
1M
-1.81%
6M
22.00%
YTD
28.54%
1Y
28.70%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDFL vs. BOUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDFL and BOUT is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025

0.59

The correlation between DDFL and BOUT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDFL vs. BOUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDFL
DDFL Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DDFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDFL Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
DDFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDFL Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

BOUT
BOUT Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BOUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOUT Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
BOUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOUT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDFL vs. BOUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July (DDFL) and Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDFLBOUTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.22

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.06

2.39

+2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.72

6.98

+18.74

DDFL vs. BOUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDFL Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the BOUT Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDFL and BOUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDFL vs. BOUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDFL drawdown since its inception was -1.83%, smaller than the maximum BOUT drawdown of -36.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFL and BOUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDFLBOUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.83%

-36.98%

+35.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.63%

-11.76%

+10.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.63%

+4.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.30%

-12.24%

+11.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.32%

4.02%

-3.70%

Volatility

DDFL vs. BOUT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July (DDFL) is 0.58%, while Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) has a volatility of 7.67%. This indicates that DDFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDFLBOUTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

7.67%

-7.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

17.70%

-15.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18%

22.45%

-19.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.65%

19.81%

-16.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.65%

23.02%

-19.37%

DDFL vs. BOUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDFL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BOUT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDFL vs. BOUT - Dividend Comparison

DDFL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BOUT
Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF
0.27%0.34%0.60%1.32%1.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.22%
DDFL
Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDFL and BOUT have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOUT has higher volatility (7.67%) compared to DDFL (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDFL dropped -1.83% vs BOUT's -36.98%.

On 1-year performance, BOUT leads with 28.70% vs 8.17% for DDFL. On fees, DDFL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, DDFL has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BOUT has performed better with a 28.70% return vs 8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DDFL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BOUT.

BOUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.00% for DDFL.

DDFL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BOUT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFL and 0.80% for BOUT.

DDFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDFL and BOUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer