DDFF vs. ZAPR
DDFF (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February) and ZAPR (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
DDFF vs. ZAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDFF
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ZAPR
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 3.82%
- 1Y
- 6.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $85.90K | $147.25K | $327.77K | |
| $55.96K | $95.56K | $464.63K |
DDFF vs. ZAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DDFF Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February | 3.99% |
ZAPR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April | 3.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDFF and ZAPR is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDFF vs. ZAPR — Risk / Return Rank
DDFF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ZAPR
DDFF vs. ZAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February (DDFF) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April (ZAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDFF | ZAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 15.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 66.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDFF vs. ZAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDFF drawdown since its inception was -3.72%, which is greater than ZAPR's maximum drawdown of -1.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFF and ZAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDFF | ZAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -1.72% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -0.09% | -0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.10% | — |
Volatility
DDFF vs. ZAPR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDFF | ZAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.38% | 1.47% | +3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 2.42% | +2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 2.42% | +2.96% |
DDFF vs. ZAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DDFF and ZAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
DDFF vs. ZAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDFF nor ZAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DDFF and ZAPR have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDFF and ZAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
DDFF and ZAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for DDFF and ZAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer