DDFF vs. FBUF
DDFF (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February) and FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DDFF charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FBUF.
Performance
DDFF vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDFF
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBUF
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 3.46%
- 6M
- 4.08%
- 1Y
- 17.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDFF vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DDFF Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February | 2.54% |
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | 1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDFF and FBUF is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDFF vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank
DDFF
FBUF
DDFF vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February (DDFF) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDFF | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 1.35 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
DDFF vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDFF drawdown since its inception was -3.72%, smaller than the maximum FBUF drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFF and FBUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDFF | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -11.09% | +7.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -1.98% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.62% | -1.37% | +0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.26% | — |
Volatility
DDFF vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDFF | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.90% | 7.76% | -1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.90% | 9.63% | -3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.90% | 9.63% | -3.73% |
DDFF vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDFF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDFF vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison
DDFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DDFF Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | 0.64% | 0.64% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDFF and FBUF have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDFF.
FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for DDFF.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFF and 0.48% for FBUF.
Find the right allocation for DDFF and FBUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer