DDFF vs. CPSM
DDFF (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February) and CPSM (Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDFF charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CPSM.
Performance
DDFF vs. CPSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDFF
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CPSM
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 2.08%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- 5.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDFF vs. CPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DDFF Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February | 3.29% |
CPSM Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDFF and CPSM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDFF vs. CPSM — Risk / Return Rank
DDFF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CPSM
DDFF vs. CPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February (DDFF) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDFF | CPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.73 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 11.26 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 49.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDFF vs. CPSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDFF drawdown since its inception was -3.72%, smaller than the maximum CPSM drawdown of -5.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFF and CPSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDFF | CPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -5.19% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -0.25% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.59% | -0.20% | -0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.11% | — |
Volatility
DDFF vs. CPSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDFF | CPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.81% | 1.65% | +4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 5.05% | +0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 5.05% | +0.76% |
DDFF vs. CPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDFF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CPSM's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDFF vs. CPSM - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDFF nor CPSM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DDFF and CPSM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CPSM is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CPSM is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDFF.
DDFF and CPSM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFF and 0.69% for CPSM.
Find the right allocation for DDFF and CPSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer