PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDEC vs. XIMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DDEC vs. XIMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DDEC vs. XIMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDEC achieves a -1.64% return, which is significantly lower than XIMR's 1.22% return.


DDEC

1D
0.16%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
-1.64%
6M
1.28%
1Y
13.05%
3Y*
11.50%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*

XIMR

1D
1.01%
1M
0.59%
YTD
1.22%
6M
2.70%
1Y
7.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DDEC vs. XIMR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDEC and XIMR have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Return for Risk

DDEC vs. XIMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDEC
DDEC Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

XIMR
XIMR Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XIMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
XIMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIMR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDEC vs. XIMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDECXIMRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.52

1.21

+0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

1.86

+0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.48

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

1.51

+0.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.53

11.09

+0.44

DDEC vs. XIMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the XIMR Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDEC and XIMR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDECXIMRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

1.21

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

1.49

-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between DDEC and XIMR is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DDEC vs. XIMR - Dividend Comparison

DDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XIMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%.


Drawdowns

DDEC vs. XIMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDEC drawdown since its inception was -10.22%, which is greater than XIMR's maximum drawdown of -5.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDEC and XIMR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DDECXIMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-5.12%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.46%

-4.79%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-0.08%

-2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-0.19%

-1.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

0.65%

+0.50%

Volatility

DDEC vs. XIMR - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) at 1.31%. This indicates that DDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DDECXIMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

1.31%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.55%

1.51%

+3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.63%

5.81%

+2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.99%

4.50%

+2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.92%

4.50%

+2.42%