DDEC vs. BUFD
DDEC (FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December) and BUFD (FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from FT Vest. DDEC is passively managed, while BUFD is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DDEC returned 8.39%/yr vs 7.68%/yr for BUFD. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DDEC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFD.
Performance
DDEC vs. BUFD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with DDEC at 5.17% and BUFD at 5.17%.
DDEC
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.92%
- YTD
- 5.17%
- 6M
- 6.29%
- 1Y
- 16.80%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFD
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 5.17%
- 6M
- 5.92%
- 1Y
- 14.85%
- 3Y*
- 12.12%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- —
DDEC vs. BUFD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDEC FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December | 5.17% | 12.33% | 12.26% | 16.82% | -6.71% | 6.79% |
BUFD FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF | 5.17% | 10.66% | 12.42% | 15.40% | -7.70% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDEC and BUFD is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between DDEC and BUFD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
DDEC vs. BUFD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DDEC
BUFD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DDEC
BUFD
Financial Services
DDEC
BUFD
Communication Services
DDEC
BUFD
Consumer Cyclical
DDEC
BUFD
Healthcare
DDEC
BUFD
Industrials
DDEC
BUFD
Consumer Defensive
DDEC
BUFD
Energy
DDEC
BUFD
Utilities
DDEC
BUFD
Real Estate
DDEC
BUFD
Basic Materials
DDEC
BUFD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDEC vs. BUFD — Risk / Return Rank
DDEC
BUFD
DDEC vs. BUFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC) and FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DDEC | BUFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.92 | 2.87 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.30 | 4.44 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.60 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 4.46 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.55 | 24.34 | -3.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDEC | BUFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | 2.87 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.20 | 1.00 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 1.00 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
DDEC vs. BUFD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDEC drawdown since its inception was -10.22%, roughly equal to the maximum BUFD drawdown of -10.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDEC and BUFD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDEC | BUFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -10.75% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.18% | -3.43% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.40% | -10.15% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.22% | -10.75% | +0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.07% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.87% | -1.97% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 0.63% | +0.20% |
Volatility
DDEC vs. BUFD - Volatility Comparison
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD) at 0.78%. This indicates that DDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDEC | BUFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.91% | 0.78% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.36% | 3.94% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.79% | 5.20% | +0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.02% | 7.73% | -0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.87% | 7.55% | -0.68% |
DDEC vs. BUFD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDEC vs. BUFD - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDEC nor BUFD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, DDEC and BUFD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DDEC has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to BUFD (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDEC dropped -10.22% vs BUFD's -10.75%.
On 5-year performance, DDEC leads with 8.39% vs 7.68% for BUFD. On fees, DDEC is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, BUFD has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DDEC has performed better with a 8.39% return vs 7.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DDEC is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFD.
DDEC and BUFD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DDEC and 0.95% for BUFD.
DDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DDEC and BUFD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer