PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XIMR vs. BGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XIMR vs. BGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XIMR vs. BGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIMR achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly higher than BGLD's 0.18% return.


XIMR

1D
1.01%
1M
0.59%
YTD
1.22%
6M
2.70%
1Y
7.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BGLD

1D
2.63%
1M
-6.42%
YTD
0.18%
6M
2.66%
1Y
16.42%
3Y*
20.21%
5Y*
12.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XIMR vs. BGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIMR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BGLD's 0.91% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XIMR vs. BGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIMR
XIMR Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XIMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
XIMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIMR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

BGLD
BGLD Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIMR vs. BGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XIMRBGLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

1.37

-0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.86

1.89

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.28

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.51

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.09

7.80

+3.29

XIMR vs. BGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIMR Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the BGLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIMR and BGLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XIMRBGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

1.37

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

1.09

+0.40

Correlation

The correlation between XIMR and BGLD is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XIMR vs. BGLD - Dividend Comparison

XIMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%, less than BGLD's 44.24% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
XIMR
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March
6.35%6.41%4.44%0.00%0.00%
BGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF
44.24%44.32%25.04%10.49%0.40%

Drawdowns

XIMR vs. BGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIMR drawdown since its inception was -5.12%, smaller than the maximum BGLD drawdown of -16.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIMR and BGLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XIMRBGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-16.19%

+11.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.79%

-11.11%

+6.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-7.35%

+7.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.19%

-3.54%

+3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

2.15%

-1.50%

Volatility

XIMR vs. BGLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) is 1.31%, while FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that XIMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XIMRBGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

6.83%

-5.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.51%

9.28%

-7.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.81%

12.06%

-6.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.50%

9.88%

-5.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.50%

9.87%

-5.37%