PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDEC vs. LQTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DDEC vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DDEC vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDEC achieves a -1.64% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's -0.44% return.


DDEC

1D
0.16%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
-1.64%
6M
1.28%
1Y
13.05%
3Y*
11.50%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*

LQTI

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
-0.44%
6M
-0.03%
1Y
4.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DDEC vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DDEC vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDEC
DDEC Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

LQTI
LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDEC vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDECLQTIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.52

0.74

+0.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

1.02

+1.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.14

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

1.37

+1.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.53

4.15

+7.38

DDEC vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDEC and LQTI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDECLQTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

0.74

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.90

+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between DDEC and LQTI is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DDEC vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

DDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LQTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.07%.


Drawdowns

DDEC vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDEC drawdown since its inception was -10.22%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDEC and LQTI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DDECLQTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-3.41%

-6.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.46%

-3.41%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-2.03%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-0.78%

-1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

1.12%

+0.03%

Volatility

DDEC vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 2.66%. This indicates that DDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DDECLQTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

2.66%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.55%

3.87%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.63%

6.23%

+2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.99%

6.11%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.92%

6.11%

+0.81%