PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDEC vs. DMAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DDEC vs. DMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DDEC vs. DMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DDEC
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December
-1.64%12.33%12.26%16.82%-6.71%5.92%
DMAR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March
2.10%9.13%12.74%12.25%-5.48%7.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDEC achieves a -1.64% return, which is significantly lower than DMAR's 2.10% return.


DDEC

1D
0.16%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
-1.64%
6M
1.28%
1Y
13.05%
3Y*
11.50%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*

DMAR

1D
0.30%
1M
1.00%
YTD
2.10%
6M
4.31%
1Y
12.72%
3Y*
11.26%
5Y*
7.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DDEC vs. DMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDEC and DMAR have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Return for Risk

DDEC vs. DMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDEC
DDEC Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAR
DMAR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDEC vs. DMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDECDMARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.52

1.68

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

2.48

-0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.52

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.09

+0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.53

13.80

-2.27

DDEC vs. DMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the DMAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDEC and DMAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDECDMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

1.68

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

1.01

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

1.04

+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between DDEC and DMAR is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DDEC vs. DMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDEC nor DMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

DDEC vs. DMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDEC drawdown since its inception was -10.22%, roughly equal to the maximum DMAR drawdown of -9.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDEC and DMAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DDECDMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-9.84%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.46%

-6.15%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.22%

-9.84%

-0.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

0.00%

-2.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-1.91%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

0.93%

+0.22%

Volatility

DDEC vs. DMAR - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) at 1.94%. This indicates that DDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DDECDMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

1.94%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.55%

2.72%

+1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.63%

7.59%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.99%

7.06%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.92%

7.04%

-0.12%