DDEC vs. APRB
DDEC (FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December) and APRB (Aptus April Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. DDEC is passively managed, while APRB is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DDEC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for APRB.
Performance
DDEC vs. APRB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DDEC having a 4.97% return and APRB slightly lower at 4.77%.
DDEC
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 4.97%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- 1Y
- 16.08%
- 3Y*
- 12.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- —
APRB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 4.77%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDEC vs. APRB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDEC FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December | 4.97% | 3.36% |
APRB Aptus April Buffer ETF | 4.77% | 2.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDEC and APRB is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDEC vs. APRB — Risk / Return Rank
DDEC
APRB
DDEC vs. APRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DDEC | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDEC | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 2.00 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
DDEC vs. APRB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDEC drawdown since its inception was -10.22%, which is greater than APRB's maximum drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDEC and APRB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDEC | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -4.59% | -5.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.11% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.87% | -0.74% | -1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | — | — |
Volatility
DDEC vs. APRB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDEC | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.36% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.79% | 5.98% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.02% | 5.98% | +1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.87% | 5.98% | +0.89% |
DDEC vs. APRB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than APRB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDEC vs. APRB - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDEC nor APRB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DDEC and APRB have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DDEC.
DDEC and APRB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DDEC and 0.25% for APRB.
Find the right allocation for DDEC and APRB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer