PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCRE vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCRE vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCRE) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCRE achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.26% return.


DCRE

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.11%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.51%
1Y
4.74%
3Y*
6.20%
5Y*
10Y*

XLE

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
32.26%
6M
29.34%
1Y
47.98%
3Y*
17.74%
5Y*
20.45%
10Y*
9.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCRE vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DCRE
DoubleLine Commercial Real Estate ETF
1.39%5.86%6.86%5.27%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
32.26%7.88%5.56%1.19%

Correlation

The correlation between DCRE and XLE is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2023

-0.10

The correlation between DCRE and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.09 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCRE vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCRE
DCRE Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DCRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCRE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
DCRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCRE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCRE vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCRE) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DCREXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.96

1.38

+0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.98

4.00

+2.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.78

11.60

+14.18

DCRE vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCRE Sharpe Ratio is 4.16, which is higher than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCRE and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DCREXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.16

2.36

+1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.90

0.31

+3.59

Drawdowns

DCRE vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCRE drawdown since its inception was -0.84%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCRE and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCREXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-71.26%

+70.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.68%

-12.05%

+11.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.84%

-20.14%

+19.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-6.09%

+5.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-17.98%

+17.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

4.15%

-3.97%

Volatility

DCRE vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCRE) is 0.47%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that DCRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCREXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

8.25%

-7.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.88%

16.51%

-15.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14%

20.50%

-19.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.58%

26.01%

-24.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.58%

29.58%

-28.00%

DCRE vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCRE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

DCRE vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

DCRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than XLE's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DCRE
DoubleLine Commercial Real Estate ETF
4.75%4.84%5.52%3.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


DCRE and XLE have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to DCRE (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCRE dropped -0.84% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 3-year performance, XLE leads with 17.74% vs 6.20% for DCRE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DCRE has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XLE has performed better with a 17.74% return vs 6.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DCRE.

DCRE has the higher dividend yield at 4.75%, compared with 2.54% for XLE.

DCRE is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while XLE is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DCRE and 0.08% for XLE.

DCRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.16 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCRE and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer