PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCPYX vs. GC=F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DCPYX vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Core Plus Fund (DCPYX) and Gold (GC=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DCPYX vs. GC=F - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCPYX
BNY Mellon Core Plus Fund
-0.56%7.04%1.39%6.14%-13.87%-1.00%9.80%11.19%-0.80%2.13%
GC=F
Gold
10.61%64.52%27.48%13.34%-0.43%-3.47%24.59%18.87%-2.14%13.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCPYX achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly lower than GC=F's 10.61% return. Over the past 10 years, DCPYX has underperformed GC=F with an annualized return of 1.86%, while GC=F has yielded a comparatively higher 14.62% annualized return.


DCPYX

1D
0.33%
1M
-2.03%
YTD
-0.56%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
3.46%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*
1.86%

GC=F

1D
2.95%
1M
-9.63%
YTD
10.61%
6M
23.71%
1Y
53.41%
3Y*
34.44%
5Y*
22.61%
10Y*
14.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCPYX vs. GC=F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCPYX
DCPYX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
DCPYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCPYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCPYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
DCPYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCPYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

GC=F
GC=F Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GC=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GC=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
GC=F Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GC=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
GC=F Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCPYX vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Core Plus Fund (DCPYX) and Gold (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DCPYXGC=FDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

1.85

-1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.21

2.26

-1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.34

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

2.74

-1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.17

10.15

-5.97

DCPYX vs. GC=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCPYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the GC=F Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCPYX and GC=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DCPYXGC=FDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

1.85

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

1.25

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.89

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.64

-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between DCPYX and GC=F is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Drawdowns

DCPYX vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCPYX drawdown since its inception was -19.42%, smaller than the maximum GC=F drawdown of -44.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCPYX and GC=F.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DCPYXGC=FDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.42%

-44.36%

+24.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.19%

-17.73%

+14.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.42%

-20.43%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.42%

-20.87%

+1.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

-10.04%

+7.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-13.03%

+8.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

4.78%

-3.72%

Volatility

DCPYX vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Core Plus Fund (DCPYX) is 1.61%, while Gold (GC=F) has a volatility of 11.29%. This indicates that DCPYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GC=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DCPYXGC=FDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

11.29%

-9.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.57%

24.59%

-22.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.53%

27.77%

-23.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.79%

17.96%

-12.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.86%

16.36%

-11.50%