PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GC=F vs. GLL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GC=FGLL
YTD Return12.86%-17.83%
1Y Return21.16%-26.09%
3Y Return (Ann)8.40%-14.87%
5Y Return (Ann)9.60%-18.75%
10Y Return (Ann)5.06%-12.54%
Sharpe Ratio1.45-0.98
Daily Std Dev13.89%26.50%
Max Drawdown-44.36%-96.25%
Current Drawdown-4.36%-95.89%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.0-0.3

The correlation between GC=F and GLL is -0.35. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Performance

GC=F vs. GLL - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GC=F achieves a 12.86% return, which is significantly higher than GLL's -17.83% return. Over the past 10 years, GC=F has outperformed GLL with an annualized return of 5.06%, while GLL has yielded a comparatively lower -12.54% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-100.00%-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%2024FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
202.77%
-95.76%
GC=F
GLL

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Gold

ProShares UltraShort Gold

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GC=F vs. GLL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold (GC=F) and ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GC=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.001.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 2.02, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.002.02
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 1.78, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.501.78
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 7.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.007.26
GLL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLL, currently valued at -0.95, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.00-0.95
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLL, currently valued at -1.31, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.00-1.31
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GLL, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.400.84
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLL, currently valued at -0.25, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.50-0.25
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GLL, currently valued at -1.05, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.00-1.05

GC=F vs. GLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GC=F Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the GLL Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of GC=F and GLL.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.002024FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
1.45
-0.95
GC=F
GLL

Drawdowns

GC=F vs. GLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GC=F drawdown since its inception was -44.36%, smaller than the maximum GLL drawdown of -96.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GC=F and GLL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%2024FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
-4.36%
-95.89%
GC=F
GLL

Volatility

GC=F vs. GLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gold (GC=F) is 4.97%, while ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) has a volatility of 10.22%. This indicates that GC=F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%2024FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
4.97%
10.22%
GC=F
GLL