PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GC=F vs. GLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GC=F vs. GLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gold Futures (GC=F) and ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GC=F

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLL

1D
-2.61%
1M
7.00%
6M
14.60%
YTD
1.15%
1Y
-39.42%
3Y*
-38.23%
5Y*
-27.27%
10Y*
-20.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GC=F vs. GLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GC=F
Gold Futures
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.84%
GLL
ProShares UltraShort Gold
1.15%-62.81%-33.33%-14.91%-6.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GC=F and GLL is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022

-0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GC=F vs. GLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GC=F

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GLL
GLL Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
GLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLL Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
GLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLL Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GC=F vs. GLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Futures (GC=F) and ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GC=FGLLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.89

GC=F vs. GLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GC=F vs. GLL - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GC=FGLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-65.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.22%

Volatility

GC=F vs. GLL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GC=FGLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


GC=F and GLL have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GC=F and GLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer