PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCPE vs. ILCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCPE vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF (DCPE) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCPE achieves a -1.70% return, which is significantly lower than ILCV's 7.75% return.


DCPE

1D
-0.48%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
-1.70%
6M
-1.38%
1Y
3.29%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
10Y*

ILCV

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.76%
YTD
7.75%
6M
7.41%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
11.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCPE vs. ILCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DCPE
DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF
-1.70%9.10%14.40%27.65%-15.28%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
7.75%18.79%17.03%14.43%-6.27%

Correlation

The correlation between DCPE and ILCV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022

0.87

The correlation between DCPE and ILCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCPE vs. ILCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCPE
DCPE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
DCPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCPE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
DCPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCPE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCV
ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCPE vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF (DCPE) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DCPEILCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.50

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

4.08

-3.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.24

16.87

-15.63

DCPE vs. ILCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCPE Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the ILCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCPE and ILCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DCPEILCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

2.72

-2.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.46

-0.04

Drawdowns

DCPE vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCPE drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, smaller than the maximum ILCV drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCPE and ILCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCPEILCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.07%

-58.63%

+36.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-6.55%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.32%

-14.95%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.83%

-0.60%

-4.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-9.32%

+4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

1.58%

+1.07%

Volatility

DCPE vs. ILCV - Volatility Comparison

DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF (DCPE) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) at 2.01%. This indicates that DCPE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCPEILCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

2.01%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.04%

6.97%

+1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.89%

9.82%

+1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

14.21%

+2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.93%

16.66%

+0.27%

DCPE vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCPE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

DCPE vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison

DCPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than ILCV's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DCPE
DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF
1.41%1.39%1.23%1.01%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
1.63%1.77%1.99%2.27%2.32%2.01%2.96%2.70%2.93%2.32%2.76%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


DCPE and ILCV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCPE has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to ILCV (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCPE dropped -22.07% vs ILCV's -58.63%.

On 3-year performance, ILCV leads with 18.61% vs 12.19% for DCPE. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ILCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ILCV has performed better with a 18.61% return vs 12.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DCPE.

ILCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.41% for DCPE.

DCPE tracks Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Index, while ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DCPE and 0.04% for ILCV.

ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCPE and ILCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer