DCOR vs. VT
DCOR (Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DCOR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. DCOR is actively managed, while VT is passively managed. Over the past year, DCOR returned 28.02% vs 29.24% for VT. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DCOR charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
DCOR vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DCOR achieves a 11.56% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 12.24% return.
DCOR
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 4.40%
- YTD
- 11.56%
- 6M
- 11.77%
- 1Y
- 28.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VT
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 12.24%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
DCOR vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | 11.56% | 15.96% | 21.19% | 7.83% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.24% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 7.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between DCOR and VT is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023 | 0.95 |
The correlation between DCOR and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
DCOR vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DCOR
VT
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
DCOR
VT
Financial Services
DCOR
VT
Industrials
DCOR
VT
Consumer Cyclical
DCOR
VT
Communication Services
DCOR
VT
Healthcare
DCOR
VT
Energy
DCOR
VT
Consumer Defensive
DCOR
VT
Basic Materials
DCOR
VT
Utilities
DCOR
VT
Real Estate
DCOR
VT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DCOR vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
DCOR
VT
DCOR vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF (DCOR) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DCOR | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.42 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 3.04 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.19 | 13.53 | +1.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DCOR | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 2.31 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.41 | 0.44 | +0.98 |
Drawdowns
DCOR vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DCOR drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCOR and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DCOR | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.10% | -50.27% | +31.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.26% | -9.67% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -0.88% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.20% | -7.02% | +4.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 2.17% | -0.32% |
Volatility
DCOR vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF (DCOR) is 2.90%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that DCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DCOR | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 3.83% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.79% | 10.17% | -1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.84% | 12.70% | -0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 16.05% | -0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 17.23% | -2.08% |
DCOR vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DCOR has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DCOR vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
DCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than VT's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | 0.91% | 0.97% | 0.98% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.59% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, DCOR and VT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VT has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to DCOR (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCOR dropped -19.10% vs VT's -50.27%.
On 1-year performance, VT leads with 29.24% vs 28.02% for DCOR. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, DCOR has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VT has performed better with a 29.24% return vs 28.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for DCOR.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.91% for DCOR.
DCOR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for DCOR and 0.06% for VT.
DCOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DCOR and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer