DCOR vs. SPYM
DCOR (Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DCOR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. DCOR is actively managed, while SPYM is passively managed. Over the past year, DCOR returned 28.02% vs 28.09% for SPYM. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DCOR charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.
Performance
DCOR vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DCOR achieves a 11.56% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 10.98% return.
DCOR
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 4.40%
- YTD
- 11.56%
- 6M
- 11.77%
- 1Y
- 28.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYM
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 10.98%
- 6M
- 10.98%
- 1Y
- 28.09%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.91%
- 10Y*
- 15.62%
DCOR vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | 11.56% | 15.96% | 21.19% | 7.83% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 10.98% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 7.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between DCOR and SPYM is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023 | 0.96 |
The correlation between DCOR and SPYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
DCOR vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DCOR
SPYM
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
DCOR
SPYM
Financial Services
DCOR
SPYM
Industrials
DCOR
SPYM
Consumer Cyclical
DCOR
SPYM
Communication Services
DCOR
SPYM
Healthcare
DCOR
SPYM
Energy
DCOR
SPYM
Consumer Defensive
DCOR
SPYM
Basic Materials
DCOR
SPYM
Utilities
DCOR
SPYM
Real Estate
DCOR
SPYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DCOR vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
DCOR
SPYM
DCOR vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF (DCOR) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DCOR | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.44 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 3.17 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.19 | 14.76 | +0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DCOR | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 2.39 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.41 | 0.62 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
DCOR vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DCOR drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCOR and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DCOR | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.10% | -54.46% | +35.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.26% | -8.90% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -0.66% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.20% | -7.15% | +4.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 1.91% | -0.06% |
Volatility
DCOR vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF (DCOR) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) have volatilities of 2.90% and 2.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DCOR | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 2.83% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.79% | 8.90% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.84% | 11.80% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 16.80% | -1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 18.00% | -2.85% |
DCOR vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DCOR has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DCOR vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
DCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than SPYM's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | 0.91% | 0.97% | 0.98% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.00% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, DCOR and SPYM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DCOR has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to SPYM (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCOR dropped -19.10% vs SPYM's -54.46%.
On 1-year performance, SPYM leads with 28.09% vs 28.02% for DCOR. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 28.09% return vs 28.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for DCOR.
SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.91% for DCOR.
DCOR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for DCOR and 0.02% for SPYM.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DCOR and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer