DCOR vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DCOR (Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DCOR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. DCOR is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, DCOR returned 25.01% vs 4.07% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. DCOR charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

DCOR vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF (DCOR) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCOR achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.32% return.

DCOR

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: 9.96%
• 6M: 8.83%
• 1Y: 25.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 6M: 2.37%
• 1Y: 4.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCOR vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF	9.96%	14.11%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.32%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between DCOR and RBIL is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.19

Return for Risk

DCOR vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCOR

DCOR Risk / Return Rank: 66
DCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
DCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
DCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 63
DCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
DCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 74

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCOR vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF (DCOR) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DCOR	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	4.35	-2.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	6.69	-3.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	2.13	-0.76
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	7.82	-4.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.29	42.95	-29.66

DCOR vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCOR Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCOR and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DCOR vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCOR drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCOR and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DCOR	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.10%	-0.52%	-18.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.26%	-0.52%	-7.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.11%	-0.50%	-1.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.18%	-0.07%	-2.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	0.10%	+1.79%

Volatility

DCOR vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF (DCOR) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that DCOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DCOR	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.58%	0.36%	+4.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.60%	0.85%	+8.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.39%	0.95%	+11.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.22%	1.07%	+14.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.22%	1.07%	+14.15%

DCOR vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCOR has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DCOR vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

DCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF	0.93%	0.97%	0.98%	0.40%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.38%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DCOR and RBIL in my portfolio?

DCOR and RBIL have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DCOR or RBIL?

DCOR has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCOR dropped -19.10% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

Which ETF is better, DCOR or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, DCOR leads with 25.01% vs 4.07% for RBIL. On fees, DCOR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DCOR or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, DCOR has performed better with a 25.01% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DCOR or RBIL?

DCOR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for RBIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DCOR or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 0.93% for DCOR.

What is the main difference between DCOR and RBIL?

DCOR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for DCOR and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.