DCOR vs. BUFH
DCOR (Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DCOR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DCOR charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
DCOR vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DCOR achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.47% return.
DCOR
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 6M
- 12.22%
- 1Y
- 28.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 2.47%
- 6M
- 2.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DCOR vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | 12.26% | 12.71% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.47% | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between DCOR and BUFH is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DCOR vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
DCOR
BUFH
DCOR vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF (DCOR) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DCOR | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.68 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DCOR | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 2.91 | -1.48 |
Drawdowns
DCOR vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DCOR drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCOR and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DCOR | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.10% | -1.53% | -17.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.02% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.20% | -0.18% | -2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | — | — |
Volatility
DCOR vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DCOR | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.83% | 2.36% | +9.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.14% | 2.36% | +12.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.14% | 2.36% | +12.78% |
DCOR vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DCOR has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DCOR vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
DCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | 0.91% | 0.97% | 0.98% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DCOR and BUFH have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DCOR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DCOR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
DCOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
DCOR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for DCOR and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for DCOR and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer