DCOR vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DCOR (Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - DCOR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. DCOR is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past year, DCOR returned 29.82% vs 89.50% for BNO. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. DCOR charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

DCOR vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF (DCOR) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCOR achieves a 12.29% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 86.76% return.

DCOR

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 4.63%
• YTD: 12.29%
• 6M: 13.03%
• 1Y: 29.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -7.65%
• YTD: 86.76%
• 6M: 83.45%
• 1Y: 89.50%
• 3Y*: 27.10%
• 5Y*: 23.77%
• 10Y*: 13.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCOR vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF	12.29%	15.96%	21.19%	7.83%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	86.76%	-5.44%	9.67%	-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between DCOR and BNO is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023	-0.05

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DCOR and BNO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.04 to -0.29, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

DCOR vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCOR

DCOR Risk / Return Rank: 77
DCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
DCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
DCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 76
DCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
DCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 81

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCOR vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF (DCOR) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DCOR	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	2.17	+0.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.48	2.68	+0.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.37	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.67	5.39	-1.72
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.39	10.23	+6.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DCOR vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCOR Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCOR and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DCOR	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54	2.17	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.44	0.14	+1.30

Drawdowns

DCOR vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCOR drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCOR and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DCOR	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.10%	-87.06%	+67.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.26%	-17.87%	+9.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-12.04%	+12.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.20%	-40.18%	+37.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	9.43%	-7.58%

Volatility

DCOR vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF (DCOR) is 2.84%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 15.03%. This indicates that DCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DCOR	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.84%	15.03%	-12.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.78%	36.08%	-27.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.82%	41.56%	-29.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.16%	35.37%	-20.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.16%	36.68%	-21.52%

DCOR vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCOR has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

DCOR vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

DCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF	0.91%	0.97%	0.98%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DCOR and BNO in my portfolio?

DCOR and BNO have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DCOR or BNO?

BNO has higher volatility (15.03%) compared to DCOR (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCOR dropped -19.10% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, DCOR or BNO?

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 89.50% vs 29.82% for DCOR. On fees, DCOR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, DCOR has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DCOR or BNO?

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 89.50% return vs 29.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DCOR or BNO?

DCOR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DCOR or BNO?

DCOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between DCOR and BNO?

DCOR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for DCOR and 0.90% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DCOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.