PortfoliosLab logo
DCOR vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DCOR and BDGS is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

DCOR vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF (DCOR) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DCOR:

0.59

BDGS:

1.49

Sortino Ratio

DCOR:

0.87

BDGS:

2.34

Omega Ratio

DCOR:

1.12

BDGS:

1.43

Calmar Ratio

DCOR:

0.53

BDGS:

1.86

Martin Ratio

DCOR:

1.93

BDGS:

8.69

Ulcer Index

DCOR:

5.25%

BDGS:

1.95%

Daily Std Dev

DCOR:

19.39%

BDGS:

11.54%

Max Drawdown

DCOR:

-19.10%

BDGS:

-9.12%

Current Drawdown

DCOR:

-4.78%

BDGS:

-0.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCOR achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's 2.08% return.


DCOR

YTD

-0.08%

1M

6.10%

6M

-4.27%

1Y

11.29%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BDGS

YTD

2.08%

1M

2.34%

6M

2.66%

1Y

17.07%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF

Bridges Capital Tactical ETF

DCOR vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCOR has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DCOR vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCOR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DCOR is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DCOR is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DCOR is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DCOR is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DCOR is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DCOR is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

BDGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDGS is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDGS is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DCOR vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF (DCOR) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current DCOR Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCOR and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

DCOR vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

DCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than BDGS's 1.77% yield.


TTM20242023
DCOR
Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF
1.08%0.98%0.40%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
1.77%1.81%0.84%

Drawdowns

DCOR vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCOR drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCOR and BDGS.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

DCOR vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF (DCOR) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.23%. This indicates that DCOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...