PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCO vs. TXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DCO vs. TXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ducommun Incorporated (DCO) and Textron Inc. (TXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCO achieves a 57.95% return, which is significantly higher than TXT's 4.84% return. Over the past 10 years, DCO has outperformed TXT with an annualized return of 24.15%, while TXT has yielded a comparatively lower 8.81% annualized return.


DCO

1D
1.10%
1M
6.39%
YTD
57.95%
6M
66.79%
1Y
113.92%
3Y*
51.29%
5Y*
23.26%
10Y*
24.15%

TXT

1D
1.99%
1M
-3.54%
YTD
4.84%
6M
10.90%
1Y
24.38%
3Y*
12.68%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
8.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCO vs. TXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCO
Ducommun Incorporated
57.95%49.43%22.28%4.20%6.82%-12.91%6.27%39.12%27.66%11.31%
TXT
Textron Inc.
4.84%14.08%-4.80%13.71%-7.87%59.93%8.60%-2.86%-18.62%16.72%

Correlation

The correlation between DCO and TXT is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 1984

0.26

The correlation between DCO and TXT shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DCO:

$2.34B

TXT:

$16.10B

EPS

DCO:

-$2.27

TXT:

$5.23

PS Ratio

DCO:

2.72

TXT:

1.07

PB Ratio

DCO:

3.50

TXT:

2.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

DCO:

$839.64M

TXT:

$15.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DCO:

$226.25M

TXT:

$2.19B

EBITDA (TTM)

DCO:

$11.47M

TXT:

$1.61B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCO vs. TXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCO
DCO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

TXT
TXT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TXT Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
TXT Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCO vs. TXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ducommun Incorporated (DCO) and Textron Inc. (TXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DCOTXTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.28

0.97

+2.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.59

1.39

+2.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.19

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.08

1.60

+5.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.50

3.43

+18.07

DCO vs. TXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCO Sharpe Ratio is 3.28, which is higher than the TXT Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCO and TXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DCOTXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.28

0.97

+2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.22

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.27

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.24

-0.08

Drawdowns

DCO vs. TXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCO drawdown since its inception was -95.13%, roughly equal to the maximum TXT drawdown of -94.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCO and TXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCOTXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.13%

-94.72%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.03%

-14.69%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.46%

-37.33%

+13.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.81%

-37.33%

+6.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.83%

-69.96%

-0.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-9.31%

+8.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.19%

-26.97%

-11.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.28%

6.87%

-1.59%

Volatility

DCO vs. TXT - Volatility Comparison

Ducommun Incorporated (DCO) has a higher volatility of 13.45% compared to Textron Inc. (TXT) at 8.03%. This indicates that DCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCOTXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.45%

8.03%

+5.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.01%

20.00%

+6.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.90%

25.29%

+9.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.50%

27.51%

+5.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.68%

32.97%

+10.71%

Dividends

DCO vs. TXT - Dividend Comparison

DCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DCO
Ducommun Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TXT
Textron Inc.
0.09%0.09%0.10%0.10%0.47%0.10%0.17%0.18%0.17%0.14%0.16%0.19%

Financials

DCO vs. TXT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ducommun Incorporated and Textron Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
209.02M
3.70B
(DCO) Total Revenue
(TXT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DCO vs. TXT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ducommun Incorporated and Textron Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%20222023202420252026
26.9%
8.7%
Portfolio components
DCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ducommun Incorporated reported a gross profit of 56.23M and revenue of 209.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.

TXT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Textron Inc. reported a gross profit of 320.00M and revenue of 3.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.7%.

DCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ducommun Incorporated reported an operating income of 15.72M and revenue of 209.02M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%.

TXT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Textron Inc. reported an operating income of 226.00M and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.

DCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ducommun Incorporated reported a net income of 9.92M and revenue of 209.02M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

TXT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Textron Inc. reported a net income of 220.00M and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DCO and TXT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCO has higher volatility (13.45%) compared to TXT (8.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCO dropped -95.13% vs TXT's -94.72%.

DCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCO and TXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer