DCO vs. TXT
DCO (Ducommun Incorporated) and TXT (Textron Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Aerospace & Defense industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, DCO returned 24.15%/yr vs 8.81%/yr for TXT. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DCO vs. TXT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DCO achieves a 57.95% return, which is significantly higher than TXT's 4.84% return. Over the past 10 years, DCO has outperformed TXT with an annualized return of 24.15%, while TXT has yielded a comparatively lower 8.81% annualized return.
DCO
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 57.95%
- 6M
- 66.79%
- 1Y
- 113.92%
- 3Y*
- 51.29%
- 5Y*
- 23.26%
- 10Y*
- 24.15%
TXT
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -3.54%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 10.90%
- 1Y
- 24.38%
- 3Y*
- 12.68%
- 5Y*
- 6.15%
- 10Y*
- 8.81%
DCO vs. TXT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCO Ducommun Incorporated | 57.95% | 49.43% | 22.28% | 4.20% | 6.82% | -12.91% | 6.27% | 39.12% | 27.66% | 11.31% |
TXT Textron Inc. | 4.84% | 14.08% | -4.80% | 13.71% | -7.87% | 59.93% | 8.60% | -2.86% | -18.62% | 16.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between DCO and TXT is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 1984 | 0.26 |
The correlation between DCO and TXT shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DCO:
$2.34B
TXT:
$16.10B
DCO:
-$2.27
TXT:
$5.23
DCO:
2.72
TXT:
1.07
DCO:
3.50
TXT:
2.01
DCO:
$839.64M
TXT:
$15.19B
DCO:
$226.25M
TXT:
$2.19B
DCO:
$11.47M
TXT:
$1.61B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DCO vs. TXT — Risk / Return Rank
DCO
TXT
DCO vs. TXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ducommun Incorporated (DCO) and Textron Inc. (TXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DCO | TXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.28 | 0.97 | +2.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.59 | 1.39 | +2.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.19 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.08 | 1.60 | +5.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.50 | 3.43 | +18.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DCO | TXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.28 | 0.97 | +2.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.22 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.27 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.24 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
DCO vs. TXT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DCO drawdown since its inception was -95.13%, roughly equal to the maximum TXT drawdown of -94.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCO and TXT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DCO | TXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.13% | -94.72% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.03% | -14.69% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.46% | -37.33% | +13.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.81% | -37.33% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.83% | -69.96% | -0.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -9.31% | +8.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.19% | -26.97% | -11.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.28% | 6.87% | -1.59% |
Volatility
DCO vs. TXT - Volatility Comparison
Ducommun Incorporated (DCO) has a higher volatility of 13.45% compared to Textron Inc. (TXT) at 8.03%. This indicates that DCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DCO | TXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.45% | 8.03% | +5.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.01% | 20.00% | +6.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.90% | 25.29% | +9.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.50% | 27.51% | +5.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.68% | 32.97% | +10.71% |
Dividends
DCO vs. TXT - Dividend Comparison
DCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCO Ducommun Incorporated | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TXT Textron Inc. | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.47% | 0.10% | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.17% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.19% |
Financials
DCO vs. TXT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ducommun Incorporated and Textron Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DCO vs. TXT - Profitability Comparison
DCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ducommun Incorporated reported a gross profit of 56.23M and revenue of 209.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.
TXT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Textron Inc. reported a gross profit of 320.00M and revenue of 3.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.7%.
DCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ducommun Incorporated reported an operating income of 15.72M and revenue of 209.02M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%.
TXT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Textron Inc. reported an operating income of 226.00M and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.
DCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ducommun Incorporated reported a net income of 9.92M and revenue of 209.02M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
TXT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Textron Inc. reported a net income of 220.00M and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DCO and TXT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DCO has higher volatility (13.45%) compared to TXT (8.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCO dropped -95.13% vs TXT's -94.72%.
DCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DCO and TXT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer